Cited by 131Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsSpinal Cord Injury ResearchMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

Prominent oligodendrocyte genesis along the border of spinal contusion lesions

Tripathi, Richa, McTigue, Dana M.·2007·Glia

Abstract

Oligodendrocyte (OL) loss and axon demyelination occur after spinal cord injury (SCI). OLs may be replaced, however, by proliferating NG2+ progenitor cells. Indeed, new OLs have been noted in ventral white matter after SCI. Since tissue adjacent to lesion cavities is exposed to different mediators compared with outlying spared tissue, the authors used a rat SCI model to compare NG2 cell proliferation and OL genesis adjacent to lesion cavities with that in spared tissue closer to meninges. NG2 cells proliferated throughout the first week postinjury and accumulated along lesion borders, especially within gray matter. By 3 days postinjury (dpi), new OLs were detected throughout the cross-sections; between 4 and 7 dpi, however, oligogenesis was restricted to lesion borders. New OLs derived from cells proliferating during 1-7 dpi increased dramatically by 14 dpi; most were located along lesion borders and in spared gray matter. Oligogenesis continued along lesion borders during the second week postinjury. Overall OL numbers were reduced at 3 dpi in spared tissue, but rebounded to normal levels by 14 dpi. Surprisingly, lesion borders maintained normal OL numbers at 3 dpi, which then rose to exceed preinjury levels at 7 and 14 dpi. These results indicate that oligogenesis is protracted after SCI and leads to increased OL numbers. Most new OLs are formed in regions of greatest NG2 cell proliferation. Thus, the adult spinal cord spontaneously develops a dynamic gliogenic zone along le…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/glia.20491

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tripathi, R., & McTigue, D. M.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
McTigue, Dana M.
Venue
Glia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03
Volume
55
Issue
7
Pages
698-711
ISSN
  • 0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1136
OpenAlex
W1972553563
Cited by
131
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Glia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS043494, P30NS045758, R01NS043494)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
spinal cord injury, lesion border, gliogenesis, demyelination, gray matter, white matter, rat model
MeSH terms
Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycan 4, Animals, Antigens, Astrocytes, Cell Count, Cell Differentiation, Female, Gliosis, Myelin Sheath, Nerve Regeneration, Oligodendroglia, Proteoglycans, Spinal Cord, Spinal Cord Injuries, Stem Cells, Time Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Recovery of Function, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Cell Proliferation, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review