Cited by 56Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingMultiple Sclerosis Research Studies

E phrin‐ A 1‐ E phA4 signaling negatively regulates myelination in the central nervous system

Harboe, Mette, Torvund‐Jensen, Julie, Kjaer‐Sorensen, Kasper, Laursen, Lisbeth S.·2018·Glia

Abstract

During development of the central nervous system not all axons are myelinated, and axons may have distinct myelination patterns. Furthermore, the number of myelin sheaths formed by each oligodendrocyte is highly variable. However, our current knowledge about the axo‐glia communication that regulates the formation of myelin sheaths spatially and temporally is limited. By using axon‐mimicking microfibers and a zebrafish model system, we show that axonal ephrin‐A1 inhibits myelination. Ephrin‐A1 interacts with EphA4 to activate the ephexin1‐RhoA‐Rock‐myosin 2 signaling cascade and causes inhibition of oligodendrocyte process extension. Both in myelinating co‐cultures and in zebrafish larvae, activation of EphA4 decreases myelination, whereas myelination is increased by inhibition of EphA4 signaling at different levels of the pathway, or by receptor knockdown. Mechanistically, the enhanced myelination is a result of a higher number of myelin sheaths formed by each oligodendrocyte, not an increased number of mature cells. Thus, we have identified EphA4 and ephrin‐A1 as novel negative regulators of myelination. Our data suggest that activation of an EphA4‐RhoA pathway in oligodendrocytes by axonal ephrin‐A1 inhibits stable axo‐glia interaction required for generating a myelin sheath.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/glia.23293

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In oligodendrocytes, RhoA/ROCK signaling causes a failure in oligodendrocyte precursor cell differentiation and process extension required for myelination.

    “In oligodendrocytes, RhoA/ROCK signaling causes a failure in oligodendrocyte precursor cell differentiation and process extension required for myelination [164,165] and also regulates ROS production [166].”

    From RhoA Signaling in Neurodegenerative Diseases (2022) · cites this paper as [165]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harboe, M., Torvund‐Jensen, J., Kjaer‐Sorensen, K., & Laursen, L. S.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics Aarhus University, Gustav Wieds Vej 10C Aarhus C 8000 Denmark
Corresponding author
Laursen, Lisbeth S.
Venue
Glia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-01-19
Volume
66
Issue
5
Pages
934-950
ISSN
  • 0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1136
OpenAlex
W2789332623
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Glia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
Keywords
ephrin-A1, EphA4, myelination, oligodendrocytes, axon-glia interaction, RhoA, rocks, myosin II, central nervous system development, zebrafish
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Central Nervous System, Cerebral Cortex, Myelin Sheath, Zebrafish, Signal Transduction, Coculture Techniques, rhoA GTP-Binding Protein, Zebrafish Proteins, Animals, Genetically Modified, Receptor, EphA4, Ephrin-A1, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review