Antidepressant efficacy and cognitive effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in vascular depression: an open trial
Abstract
Background Beneficial effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) were demonstrated by many controlled studies in major depression. Moreover, this promising and non invasive therapeutic tool seems to be better tolerated than electroconvulsive therapy.Vascular depression is a subtype of late-life depression, associated with cerebrovascular disease and means a poorer response to antidepressant treatment. We employed rTMS over the left prefrontal cortex in 11 patients with late-onset resistant vascular depression. The primary purpose of this two-week open study was to examine antidepressant efficacy of rTMS in vascular depression. The secondary aim was to evaluate cognitive effects of rTMS in our sample. Methods Clinical status, as measured with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), and cognitive effects, as evaluated by neuropsychological tests, were assessed at baseline and after two weeks of rTMS. Brain measurements to obtain an index of prefrontal atrophy were performed at both the motor cortex and prefrontal cortex. Results Five out of 11 resistant patients with late-onset vascular depression were responders. They showed a clinically meaningful improvement in HDRS scores, with a decrease of 11, 4 points (p Conclusions Our preliminary observations prompt to perform a subsequent controlled study to examine if rTMS may constitute an alternative to electroconvulsive therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some rTMS studies in late-life depression have reported improvements in attention and immediate memory, executive function, verbal fluency and visuospatial abilities, and global cognitive function.
“Some rTMS studies in LLD have reported improvements in attention and immediate memory, 29 executive function,30,31 verbal fluency and visuospatial abilities, 32 and global cognitive function.”
Cites
Scales for physical and social anhedonia.
Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Raulin, M. L. (1976) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.85.4.374 · Cited by 1,234 · see citing works
Depression in Later Life: A Comparison of Symptoms and Risk Factors in Early and Late Onset Cases
Baldwin, R. C., & Tomenson, B. (1995) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.167.5.649 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guse, B., Falkai, P., & Wobrock, T. (2010) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-009-0333-7 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Avery, D. H., Holtzheimer, P. E., Fawaz, W., Russo, J., Neumaier, J., Dunner, D. L., Haynor, D. R., Claypoole, K. H., Wajdik, C., & Roy-Byrne, P. (2006) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.07.003 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Can noninvasive brain stimulation enhance cognition in neuropsychiatric disorders?
Demirtas-Tatlidede, A., Vahabzadeh-Hagh, A. M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2013) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.06.020 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Treatment of Vascular Depression Using Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Jorge, R. E., Moser, D. J., Acion, L., & Robinson, R. G. (2008) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.45 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Serafini, G., Pompili, M., Belvederi Murri, M., Respino, M., Ghio, L., Girardi, P., Fitzgerald, P. B., & Amore, M. (2015) · Neuropsychobiology · doi:10.1159/000381351 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) for geriatric depression
Cappon, D., den Boer, T., Jordan, C., Yu, W., Metzger, E., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2022) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2021.101531 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Göke, K., McClintock, S. M., Mah, L., Rajji, T. K., Lee, H. H., Nestor, S. M., Downar, J., Noda, Y., Daskalakis, Z. J., Mulsant, B. H., et al. (2026) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/07067437251315515 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fabre, I., Galinowski, A., Oppenheim, C., Gallarda, T., Meder, J. F., de Montigny, C., Olié, J. P., & Poirier, M. F.
- Affiliations
- Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Poirier, M. F.
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-07-28
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 833-842
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- OpenAlex
- W2070660858
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, vascular depression, geriatric depression, antidepressant efficacy, cognitive effects, prefrontal cortex, treatment-resistant depression, verbal fluency, visuospatial memory, verbal memory, non-invasive brain stimulation
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Atrophy, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Cognition, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review