Semantic organizational strategy predicts verbal memory and remission rate of geriatric depression
Open accessAbstract
Objective: This study tests the hypothesis that the use of semantic organizational strategy during the free‐recall phase of a verbal memory task predicts remission of geriatric depression. Methods: Sixty‐five older patients with major depression participated in a 12‐week escitalopram treatment trial. Neuropsychological performance was assessed at baseline after a 2‐week drug washout period. The Hopkins Verbal Learning Test‐Revised was used to assess verbal learning and memory. Remission was defined as a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score of ≤7 for 2 consecutive weeks and no longer meeting the DSM‐IV‐TR criteria for major depression. The association between the number of clusters used at the final learning trial (trial 3) and remission was examined using Cox's proportional hazards survival analysis. The relationship between the number of clusters utilized in the final learning trial and the number of words recalled after a 25‐min delay was examined in a regression with age and education as covariates. Results: Higher number of clusters utilized predicted remission rates (hazard ratio, 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.04–1.54); χ2 = 4.23, df = 3, p = 0.04). There was a positive relationship between the total number of clusters used by the end of the third learning trial and the total number of words recalled at the delayed recall trial (F(3,58) = 7.93; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Effective semantic strategy use at baseline on a verbal list learning task by older depressed patients was associated with higher rates of remission with antidepressant treatment. This result provides support for previous findings indicating that measures of executive functioning at baseline are useful in predicting antidepressant response. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In older adults with major depression, poorer objective response inhibition, sustained attention, and cognitive flexibility, and more subjective complaints in these areas, predict worse antidepressant response.
“worse performance on behavioral measures requiring response inhibition, sustained attention, and cognitive flexibility, as well as greater subjective complaints of perceived weaknesses in these domains, are predictive of poor antidepressant treatment response in older adults with major depression26–28.”
From State of the Science of Neural Systems in Late‐Life Depression: Impact on Clinical Presentation and Treatment Outcome (2018) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Morimoto, S. S., Gunning, F. M., Kanellopoulos, D., Murphy, C. F., Klimstra, S. A., Kelly, R. E., & Alexopoulos, G. S.
- Affiliations
- Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Morimoto, Sarah Shizuko
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05-25
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 506-512
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- PMC
- PMC3188360
- OpenAlex
- W1484286395
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH067702, P30MH068638, R01MH079414, T32MH019132, K23MH074818)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- verbal memory, geriatric depression, remission prediction, escitalopram, antidepressant response, executive function, verbal learning, delayed recall, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, cognitive strategy use
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Semantics, Verbal Learning, Proportional Hazards Models, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review