Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 207

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The delirium experience: what is the effect on patients, relatives and staff and what can be done to modify this?

Partridge, Judith SL, Martin, Finbarr C, Harari, Danielle, Dhesi, Jugdeep K·2013·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Delirium is a common clinical syndrome with significant associated mortality, morbidity and financial cost. Less is understood about the experience of delirium for the patient, their family and staff involved in their care. Objective: This synthesis draws on qualitative and quantitative literature examining different populations (patients, relatives and staff) in different clinical settings (intensive care units, surgery and hospice care) to provide a clinical summary of the delirium experience from the perspective of patients, relatives and staff. Design: A literature search was conducted in Ovid, MEDLINE, Embase, PsychINFO, British Nursing Index and Archive and PubMed between 1980 and 2011 using the terms ‘delirium’ combined with ‘distress’, ‘recall’, ‘anxiety’, ‘depression’, ‘PTSD’, ‘experience’ and ‘patient education’. Articles were restricted to English language only. Results: Evidence suggests that some patients recall delirium and that recollections are generally distressing. Distress may be greater in relatives witnessing delirium and is also reported in professional staff. This distress may result in longer‐term psychological sequelae. Remedial action, such as explanatory information to patients and their families, may reduce distress and psychological morbidity. Conclusions: A better understanding of the experience and psychological consequences of delirium will inform the development of appropriate methods of providing support and information to those at risk of delirium and their families or carers. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.3900

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 207

Metadata

Authors
Partridge, J. S., Martin, F. C., Harari, D., & Dhesi, J. K.
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-10-30
Volume
28
Issue
8
Pages
804-812
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W1928798595
Cited by
207
References
3
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The delirium experience: what is the effect on patients, relatives and staff and what can be done to modify this? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gps.3900
The paper
Partridge, J. S., Martin, F. C., Harari, D., & Dhesi, J. K. (2013). The delirium experience: what is the effect on patients, relatives and staff and what can be done to modify this? International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.3900

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.