The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
COVID ‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University
Open accessAbstract
Starting from the spring of 2020, the outbreak of the COVID-19 caused Chinese universities to close the campuses and forced them to initiate online teaching. This paper focuses on a case of Peking University's online education. Six specific instructional strategies are presented to summarize current online teaching experiences for university instructors who might conduct online education in similar circumstances. The study concludes with five high-impact principles for online education: (a) high relevance between online instructional design and student learning, (b) effective delivery on online instructional information, (c) adequate support provided by faculty and teaching assistants to students; (d) high-quality participation to improve the breadth and depth of student's learning, and (e) contingency plan to deal with unexpected incidents of online education platforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Some studies [14-16] acknowledged that the move to online learning was significant and sudden, but that it was also necessary to continue the learning process.”
From Impact of online learning on student's performance and engagement: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [16]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“This finding concurs with Bao (2020) who declared that this method assists learners to be critical thinkers and improves their reasoning capacities.”
From Exploration of curriculum changes in the learning and teaching methods of economic and management sciences (2025) · cites this paper as Bao (2020)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Multi-dimensional Structure and Influence Mechanism of Student Academic Involvement in China
Zhang, X. (2012) · Fudan jiaoyu luntan · Cited by 9
Keming, H., & Jian, W. (2003) · Beijing Daxue jiaoyu pinglun · Cited by 3
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 3 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Bao W., 2019, Bridging the gap between research and practice: Identifying high‐impact educational practices for Chinese undergraduate education, Peking University Education Review, 1, 105
- Li Y., 2013, Research on college students' online learning behavior, e‐Education Research, 34, 59
- Shang J., 2017, “Internet plus” and the reform of higher education: A preliminary study on the development strategy of higher education informatization in China, Peking University Education Review, 1, 173
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective
Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževič, N., & Umek, L. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12208438 · Cited by 2,047
Challenges and Opportunities for Higher Education amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Philippine Context
Toquero, C. M. D. (2020) · Pedagogical Research · doi:10.29333/pr/7947 · Cited by 1,297
“However, very meager research is done in relation to the field of education on how COVID-19 or even SARS affected the educational system (Bao, 2020; Sintema, 2020; Yan, 2020). stakeholders with an opportunity to continue learning while preventing the spread of the virus.”
BackgroundCOVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices
Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184 · Cited by 1,019
Pembelajaran Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19
Herliandry, L. D., Nurhasanah, N., Suban, M. E., & Kuswanto, H. (2020) · JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan · doi:10.21009/jtp.v22i1.15286 · Cited by 907
Morales, V. J. G., Garrido‐Moreno, A., & Martín‐Rojas, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.616059 · Cited by 763
Metadata
- Authors
- Bao, W.
- Affiliations
- Graduate School of EducationInstitute of Education Economy, Peking University Beijing China
- ORCID
- Bao, Wei
- Venue
- Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 113-115
- ISSN
- 2578-1863 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7262082
- OpenAlex
- W3014723334
- Cited by
- 2,268
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 79 · 2025: 147 · 2024: 243 · 2023: 395 · 2022: 545 · 2021: 656 · 2020: 202
- FWCI
- 681.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education of China and the project The Research of Faculty Development
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, online learning, higher education, Peking University, teaching methods, online instructional design, student participation, faculty support, teaching assistants, contingency planning, online learning platforms, campus closure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
