The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural basis for sentence comprehension: Grammatical and short‐term memory components
Open accessAbstract
We monitored regional cerebral activity with BOLD fMRI while subjects were presented written sentences differing in their grammatical structure (subject‐relative or object‐relative center‐embedded clauses) and their short‐term memory demands (short or long antecedent‐gap linkages). A core region of left posterior superior temporal cortex was recruited during all sentence conditions in comparison to a pseudofont baseline, suggesting that this area plays a central role in sustaining comprehension that is common to all sentences. Right posterior superior temporal cortex was recruited during sentences with long compared to short antecedent‐gap linkages regardless of grammatical structure, suggesting that this brain region supports passive short‐term memory during sentence comprehension. Recruitment of left inferior frontal cortex was most clearly associated with sentences that featured both an object‐relative clause and a long antecedent‐gap linkage, suggesting that this region supports the cognitive resources required to maintain long‐distance syntactic dependencies during the comprehension of grammatically complex sentences. Hum. Brain Mapping 15:80–94, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies
Gibson, E. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1 · Cited by 2,537
Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing
Zatorre, R. J., Evans, A. C., Meyer, E., & Gjedde, A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.256.5058.846 · Cited by 1,507
Puce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-16-05205.1996 · Cited by 987 · cited 1×
“…temporal-occipital areas of the left hemisphere than the right hemisphere when contrasted with a baseline consisting of pseudofont characters that otherwise resembled letters in their visual characteristics [Petersen et al., 1990; Price et al., 1994, 1996; Puce et al., 1996; Pugh et al., 1996a].”
BackgroundDissociating Verbal and Spatial Working Memory Using PET
Smith, E. E., Jonides, J., & Koeppe, R. A. (1996) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/6.1.11 · Cited by 962
Awh, E., Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., Schumacher, E. H., Koeppe, R. A., & Katz, S. (1996) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00662.x · Cited by 705
Activation of the prefrontal cortex in a nonspatial working memory task with functional MRI
Cohen, J. D., Forman, S. D., Braver, T. S., Casey, B. J., Servan‐Schreiber, D., & Noll, D. C. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460010407 · Cited by 576
Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow
Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Waters, G. (1998) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892998562843 · Cited by 327
Cited by
The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function.
Friederici, A. D. (2011) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00006.2011 · Cited by 2,140
Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: phonology, semantics, and sentence processing.
Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Hervé, P. Y., Duffau, H., Crivello, F., Houdé, O., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.002 · Cited by 1,851
Friederici, A. D., Bahlmann, J., Heim, S., Schubotz, R. I., & Anwander, A. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0509389103 · Cited by 734
What is right-hemisphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing?
Vigneau, M., Beaucousin, V., Hervé, P.-Y., Jobard, G., Petit, L., Crivello, F., Mellet, E., Zago, L., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.036 · Cited by 464
Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing
Grodzinsky, Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2006) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2006.03.007 · Cited by 438
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooke, A., Zurif, E. B., DeVita, C., Alsop, D., Koenig, P., Detre, J., Gee, J., Pinãngo, M., Balogh, J., & Grossman, M.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-11-14
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 80-94
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W1991202812
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 6.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural basis for sentence comprehension: Grammatical and short‐term memory components. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.10006
- The paper
- Cooke, A., Zurif, E. B., DeVita, C., Alsop, D., Koenig, P., Detre, J., Gee, J., Pinãngo, M., Balogh, J., & Grossman, M. (2002). Neural basis for sentence comprehension: Grammatical and short‐term memory components. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
