Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

FMRI reveals brain regions mediating slow prosodic modulations in spoken sentences

Open access
Meyer, Martin, Alter, Kai, Friederici, Angela D., Lohmann, Gabriele, von Cramon, D. Yves·2002·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

By means of fMRI measurements, the present study identifies brain regions in left and right peri‐sylvian areas that subserve grammatical or prosodic processing. Normal volunteers heard 1) normal sentences; 2) so‐called syntactic sentences comprising syntactic, but no lexical‐semantic information; and 3) manipulated speech signals comprising only prosodic information, i.e., speech melody. For all conditions, significant blood oxygenation signals were recorded from the supratemporal plane bilaterally. Left hemisphere areas that surround Heschl gyrus responded more strongly during the two sentence conditions than to speech melody. This finding suggests that the anterior and posterior portions of the superior temporal region (STR) support lexical‐semantic and syntactic aspects of sentence processing. In contrast, the right superior temporal region, in especially the planum temporale, responded more strongly to speech melody. Significant brain activation in the fronto‐opercular cortices was observed when participants heard pseudo sentences and was strongest during the speech melody condition. In contrast, the fronto‐opercular area is not prominently involved in listening to normal sentences. Thus, the functional activation in fronto‐opercular regions increases as the grammatical information available in the sentence decreases. Generally, brain responses to speech melody were stronger in right than left hemisphere sites, suggesting a particular role of right cortical areas in the processing of slow prosodic modulations. Hum. Brain Mapping 17:73–88, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.10042

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Meyer, M., Alter, K., Friederici, A. D., Lohmann, G., & von Cramon, D. Y.
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-07-29
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
73-88
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2167716212
Cited by
310
References
7
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FMRI reveals brain regions mediating slow prosodic modulations in spoken sentences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.10042
The paper
Meyer, M., Alter, K., Friederici, A. D., Lohmann, G., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). FMRI reveals brain regions mediating slow prosodic modulations in spoken sentences. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10042

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.