Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparing brain activation associated with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints

Open access
Luft, Andreas R., Smith, Gerald V., Forrester, Larry, Whitall, Jill, Macko, Richard F., Hauser, Till‐Karsten, Goldberg, Andrew P., Hanley, Daniel F.·2002·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

It was shown recently that functional activation across brain motor areas during locomotion and foot movements are similar but differ substantially from activation related to upper extremity movement (Miyai [2001]: Neuroimage 14:1186–1192). The activation pattern may be a function of the behavioral context of the movement rather than of its mechanical properties. We compare motor system activation patterns associated with isolated single‐joint movement of corresponding joints in arm and leg carried out in equal frequency and range. Eleven healthy volunteers underwent BOLD‐weighted fMRI while performing repetitive elbow or knee extension/flexion. To relate elbow and knee activation to the well‐described patterns of finger movement, serial finger‐to‐thumb opposition was assessed in addition. After identifying task‐related voxels using statistical parametric mapping, activation was measured in five regions of interest (ROI; primary motor [M1] and somatosensory cortex [S1], premotor cortex, supplementary motor area [SMA] divided into preSMA and SMA‐proper, and cerebellum). Differences in the degree of activation across ROIs were found between elbow and knee movement. SMA‐proper activation was prominent for knee, but almost absent for elbow movement (P < 0.05); finger movement produced small but constant SMA‐proper activation. Ipsilateral M1 activation was detected during knee and finger movement, but was absent for the elbow task (P < 0.05). Knee movement showed less lateralization in M1 and S1 than other tasks (P < 0.05). The data demonstrate that central motor structures contribute differently to isolated elbow and knee movement. Activation during knee movement shows similarities to gait‐related activation patterns. Hum. Brain Mapping 17:131–140, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.10058

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Luft, A. R., Smith, G. V., Forrester, L., Whitall, J., Macko, R. F., Hauser, T., Goldberg, A. P., & Hanley, D. F.
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
131-140
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W1974749127
Cited by
193
References
4
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing brain activation associated with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.10058
The paper
Luft, A. R., Smith, G. V., Forrester, L., Whitall, J., Macko, R. F., Hauser, T., Goldberg, A. P., & Hanley, D. F. (2002). Comparing brain activation associated with isolated upper and lower limb movement across corresponding joints. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10058

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.