Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Three‐dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe

Open access
Hammers, Alexander, Allom, Richard, Koepp, Matthias J., Free, Samantha L., Myers, Ralph, Lemieux, Louis, Mitchell, Tejal N., Brooks, David J., Duncan, John S.·2003·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Probabilistic atlases of neuroanatomy are more representative of population anatomy than single brain atlases. They allow anatomical labeling of the results of group studies in stereotaxic space, automated anatomical labeling of individual brain imaging datasets, and the statistical assessment of normal ranges for structure volumes and extents. No such manually constructed atlas is currently available for the frequently studied group of young adults. We studied 20 normal subjects (10 women, median age 31 years) with high‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning. Images were nonuniformity corrected and reoriented along both the anterior‐posterior commissure (AC–PC) line horizontally and the midsagittal plane sagittally. Building on our previous work, we have expanded and refined existing algorithms for the subdivision of MRI datasets into anatomical structures. The resulting algorithm is presented in the Appendix. Forty‐nine structures were interactively defined as three‐dimensional volumes‐of‐interest (VOIs). The resulting 20 individual atlases were spatially transformed (normalized) into standard stereotaxic space, using SPM99 software and the MNI/ICBM 152 template. We evaluated volume data for all structures both in native space and after spatial normalization, and used the normalized superimposed atlases to create a maximum probability map in stereotaxic space, which retains quantitative information regarding inter‐subject variability. Its potential applications range from the automatic labeling of new scans to the detection of anatomical abnormalities in patients. Further data can be extracted from the atlas for the detailed analysis of individual structures. Hum. Brain Mapping 19:224–247,2003. ©2003 Wiley‐Liss,Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.10123

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 1,286

Metadata

Authors
Hammers, A., Allom, R., Koepp, M. J., Free, S. L., Myers, R., Lemieux, L., Mitchell, T. N., Brooks, D. J., & Duncan, J. S.
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05-30
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
224-247
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2129965408
Cited by
1,286
References
3
FWCI
11.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Three‐dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.10123
The paper
Hammers, A., Allom, R., Koepp, M. J., Free, S. L., Myers, R., Lemieux, L., Mitchell, T. N., Brooks, D. J., & Duncan, J. S. (2003). Three‐dimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10123

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.