Cited by 293Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Preservation of limbic and paralimbic structures in aging

Open access
Grieve, Stuart M., Clark, C. Richard, Williams, Leanne M., Peduto, Anthony J., Gordon, Evian·2005·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Patterns of gray matter (GM) loss were measured in 223 healthy subjects spanning eight decades. We observed significant clusters of accelerated loss in focal regions of the frontal and parietal cortices, including the dorsolateral frontal cortex, pre- and postcentral gyrus, and the inferior and superior parietal lobes. The rate of loss in these clusters was approximately twice that of the global average. By contrast, clusters of significant GM preservation were found in limbic and paralimbic structures, including the amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, and the cingulate gyrus. In these clusters, GM loss was attenuated significantly relative to the global rate. The preservation of these structures is consistent with the functional importance of the thalamo-limbic circuits in sensory integration, arousal, emotion, and memory, and lends credence to the idea that later-maturing cortical regions are more vulnerable to age-related morphologic changes. Moreover, the limbic findings act as a frame of reference to explore further the effects of stress and learning on these structures in an evidence-based manner across age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.20115

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relatively young age of the cohort is important because the DLPFC undergoes accelerated GM loss during normal aging, so in a geriatric MDD cohort these changes may be attenuated relative to the normal population due to age-related changes common to both groups.

    “The relatively young age of our cohort is also important since the DLPFC undergoes accelerated GM loss during “normal” aging (Grieve et al., 2005), so in a geriatric MDD cohort these changes may be attenuated relative to the normal population due to age-related changes common to both groups.”

    From Widespread reductions in gray matter volume in depression (2013) · cites this paper as Grieve et al., 2005

  • Studies using ROI or VBM have yielded contradictory results regarding whether the hippocampus is preserved or deteriorates with aging.

    “In spite of the objectivity of this method, studies led to somewhat contradictory results regarding the hippocampus: some authors have found this structure to be preserved with aging [29,31], whereas others have reported structural deterioration [38,81,84,87].”
  • The discrepancy in hippocampal findings may result from the samples selected, with preservation found when the sample covered a large life span and atrophy observed when age effects were evaluated within older samples.

    “This discrepancy may result from the samples selected in these studies. Thus, preservation of the hippocampus was found when the sample covered a large life span (17-79 years in Good et al. [29] and 8-79 in Grieve et al. [31]), whereas atrophy was observed when age effects were evaluated within older samples, i.e. 50 or 60 years and over ([38,70,81, but see [84]).”
  • In normal adults, global brain atrophy is generally more pronounced in frontal areas, often followed by parietal, temporal and insular gray matter loss.

    “Overall, the literature consistently reports global brain atrophy in normal adults, generally more pronounced in frontal areas (for a review, [63]), often followed by parietal, temporal and insular gray matter (GM) loss [1,2,29,31,70,81,87].”
  • Optimized VBM studies have systematically reported gray matter loss in the frontal lobe with aging, also affecting the insula, Heschl gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, sensorimotor areas and cerebellum.

    “Authors have systematically reported GM loss in the frontal lobe with aging [1,29,31,37,38,81,84,87], also affecting the insula, Heschl gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, sensorimotor areas and cerebellum.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 293

Authors
Grieve, S. M., Clark, C. R., Williams, L. M., Peduto, A. J., & Gordon, E.
Affiliations
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Westmead Hospital (AU)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-04-25
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
391-401
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2031854617
Cited by
293
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 15
FWCI
11.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
brain aging, gray matter loss, limbic system, amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, cingulate gyrus, frontal cortex, parietal cortex, cortical maturation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Amygdala, Atrophy, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Limbic System, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Sex Factors, Thalamus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review