CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 254Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology ResearchNeuroscience and Music Perception

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: An fMRI study employing overt speech

Open access
Christoffels, Ingrid K., Formisano, Elia, Schiller, Niels O.·2007·Human Brain Mapping
DOI 10.1002/hbm.20315PMC PMC6871445
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Speakers use external auditory feedback to monitor their own speech. Feedback distortion has been found to increase activity in the superior temporal areas. Using fMRI, the present study investigates the neural correlates of processing verbal feedback without distortion. In a blocked design, the following conditions were presented: (1) overt picture-naming, (2) overt picture-naming while pink noise was presented to mask external feedback, (3) covert picture-naming, (4) listening to the picture names (previously recorded from participants' own voices), and (5) listening to pink noise. The results show that auditory feedback processing involves a network of different areas related to general performance monitoring and speech-motor control. These include the cingulate cortex and the bilateral insula, supplementary motor area, bilateral motor areas, cerebellum, thalamus and basal ganglia. Our findings suggest that the anterior cingulate cortex, which is often implicated in error-processing and conflict-monitoring, is also engaged in ongoing speech monitoring. Furthermore, in the superior temporal gyrus, we found a reduced response to speaking under normal feedback conditions. This finding is interpreted in the framework of a forward model according to which, during speech production, the sensory consequence of the speech-motor act is predicted to attenuate the sensitivity of the auditory cortex.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.20315

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 75 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Baayen RH, 1995, The CELEX Lexical Database
  2. Ganushchak L, Effects of time pressure on verbal selfmonitoring, Brain Res.
  3. Talairach T, 1988, A Coplanar Stereotactic Atlas of the Human Brain

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–101 of 101

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Christoffels, I. K., Formisano, E., & Schiller, N. O.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Christoffels, Ingrid K.
ORCID
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01-31
Volume
28
Issue
9
Pages
868-879
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
DOI
10.1002/hbm.20315
PMC
PMC6871445
OpenAlex
W2171222168
Cited by
254
References
75
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
auditory feedback, speech monitoring, covert speech, anterior cingulate cortex, insula, supplementary motor area, basal ganglia, cerebellum, superior temporal gyrus, forward model, error monitoring, performance monitoring, speech motor control
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Feedback, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Speech, Verbal Behavior, Visual Perception, Artifacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review