The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phase lag index: Assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To address the problem of volume conduction and active reference electrodes in the assessment of functional connectivity, we propose a novel measure to quantify phase synchronization, the phase lag index (PLI), and compare its performance to the well‐known phase coherence (PC), and to the imaginary component of coherency (IC). Methods: The PLI is a measure of the asymmetry of the distribution of phase differences between two signals. The performance of PLI, PC, and IC was examined in (i) a model of 64 globally coupled oscillators, (ii) an EEG with an absence seizure, (iii) an EEG data set of 15 Alzheimer patients and 13 control subjects, and (iv) two MEG data sets. Results: PLI and PC were more sensitive than IC to increasing levels of true synchronization in the model. PC and IC were influenced stronger than PLI by spurious correlations because of common sources. All measures detected changes in synchronization during the absence seizure. In contrast to PC, PLI and IC were barely changed by the choice of different montages. PLI and IC were superior to PC in detecting changes in beta band connectivity in AD patients. Finally, PLI and IC revealed a different spatial pattern of functional connectivity in MEG data than PC. Conclusion: The PLI performed at least as well as the PC in detecting true changes in synchronization in model and real data but, at the same token and like‐wise the IC, it was much less affected by the influence of common sources and active reference electrodes. Hum Brain Mapp 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence.
Fries, P. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.08.011 · Cited by 4,284
Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas
Roelfsema, P. R., Engel, A. K., König, P., & Singer, W. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/385157a0 · Cited by 1,136
Book Review: Brain Function, Nonlinear Coupling, and Neuronal Transients
Friston, K. J. (2001) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/107385840100700510 · Cited by 141
Cited by
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2011/156869 · Cited by 10,323
Vinck, M., Oostenveld, R., van Wingerden, M., Battaglia, F., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.055 · Cited by 1,753
A Tutorial Review of Functional Connectivity Analysis Methods and Their Interpretational Pitfalls
Bastos, A. M., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2016) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00175 · Cited by 1,313
EEG and MEG: Relevance to Neuroscience
Lopes da Silva, F. (2013) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.017 · Cited by 900
Keil, A., Debener, S., Gratton, G., Junghöfer, M., Kappenman, E. S., Luck, S. J., Luu, P., Miller, G. A., & Yee, C. M. (2014) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12147 · Cited by 699
Metadata
- Authors
- Stam, C. J., Nolte, G., & Daffertshofer, A.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-31
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1178-1193
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W2109582949
- Cited by
- 2,018
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase lag index: Assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.20346
- The paper
- Stam, C. J., Nolte, G., & Daffertshofer, A. (2007). Phase lag index: Assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20346
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.