Cited by 1,753Neural dynamics and brain functionEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias

Open access
Vinck, Martin, Oostenveld, Robert, van Wingerden, Marijn, Battaglia, Franscesco, Pennartz, Cyriel M.A.·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

Phase-synchronization is a manifestation of interaction between neuronal groups measurable from LFP, EEG or MEG signals, however, volume conduction can cause the coherence and the phase locking value to spuriously increase. It has been shown that the imaginary component of the coherency (ImC) cannot be spuriously increased by volume-conduction of independent sources. Recently, it was proposed that the phase lag index (PLI), which estimates to what extent the phase leads and lags between signals from two sensors are nonequiprobable, improves on the ImC. Compared to ImC, PLI has the advantage of being less influenced by phase delays. However, sensitivity to volume-conduction and noise, and capacity to detect changes in phase-synchronization, is hindered by the discontinuity of the PLI, as small perturbations turn phase lags into leads and vice versa. To solve this problem, we introduce a related index, namely the weighted phase lag index (WPLI). Differently from PLI, in WPLI the contribution of the observed phase leads and lags is weighted by the magnitude of the imaginary component of the cross-spectrum. We demonstrate two advantages of the WPLI over the PLI, in terms of reduced sensitivity to additional, uncorrelated noise sources and increased statistical power to detect changes in phase-synchronization. Another factor that can affect phase-synchronization indices is sample-size bias. We show that, when directly estimated, both PLI and the magnitude of the ImC have typically positively biased estimators. To solve this problem, we develop an unbiased estimator of the squared PLI, and a debiased estimator of the squared WPLI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.055

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vinck, M., Oostenveld, R., van Wingerden, M., Battaglia, F., & Pennartz, C. M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Vinck, Martin
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
1548-1565
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966641148
Cited by
1,753
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 257 · 2025: 238 · 2024: 173 · 2023: 141 · 2022: 150 · 2021: 160 · 2020: 143 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 89 · 2017: 78 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 17
FWCI
15.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • BrainGain Smart Mix Programme of the Netherlands Ministry of Economic Affairs
  • Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture and Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
phase synchronization, phase lag index, weighted phase lag index, volume conduction, noise sensitivity, sample size bias, unbiased estimation, statistical power, cross-spectral density, electrophysiological signals
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Humans, Neural Conduction, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Sample Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review