The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamical consequences of lesions in cortical networks
Open accessAbstract
To understand the effects of a cortical lesion it is necessary to consider not only the loss of local neural function, but also the lesion‐induced changes in the larger network of endogenous oscillatory interactions in the brain. To investigate how network embedding influences a region's functional role, and the consequences of its being damaged, we implement two models of oscillatory cortical interactions, both of which inherit their coupling architecture from the available anatomical connection data for macaque cerebral cortex. In the first model, node dynamics are governed by Kuramoto phase oscillator equations, and we investigate the sequence in which areas entrain one another in the transition to global synchrony. In the second model, node dynamics are governed by a more realistic neural mass model, and we assess long‐run inter‐regional interactions using a measure of directed information flow. Highly connected parietal and frontal areas are found to synchronize most rapidly, more so than equally highly connected visual and somatosensory areas, and this difference can be explained in terms of the network's clustered architecture. For both models, lesion effects extend beyond the immediate neighbors of the lesioned site, and the amplitude and dispersal of nonlocal effects are again influenced by cluster patterns in the network. Although the consequences of in vivo lesions will always depend on circuitry local to the damaged site, we conclude that lesions of parietal regions (especially areas 5 and 7a) and frontal regions (especially areas 46 and FEF) have the greatest potential to disrupt the integrative aspects of neocortical function. Hum Brain Mapp, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“simulation experiments using structure-function models have predicted that even purely focal and transient perturbations in activity should result in diffuse network reorganization that affects distant brain systems (Alstott et al., 2009; Honey and Sporns, 2008; Misic et al., 2015).”
From Development of large-scale functional networks from birth to adulthood: A guide to the neuroimaging literature (2017) · cites this paper as Honey and Sporns, 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099745 · Cited by 6,576
The brainweb: phase synchronization and large-scale integration
Varela, F., Lachaux, J.-P., Rodriguez, E., & Martinerie, J. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35067550 · Cited by 4,761
Measuring Information Transfer
Schreiber, T. (2000) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.461 · Cited by 4,571
Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing
Engel, A. K., Fries, P., & Singer, W. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094565 · Cited by 3,454
Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber
Morris, C., & Lecar, H. (1981) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(81)84782-0 · Cited by 2,302
Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales
Honey, C. J., Kötter, R., Breakspear, M. J., & Sporns, O. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701519104 · Cited by 1,727
Self-citationMapping complex tissue architecture with diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging
Wedeen, V. J., Hagmann, P., Tseng, W. I., Reese, T. G., & Weisskoff, R. M. (2005) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.20642 · Cited by 1,339
Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain
Schnitzler, A., & Groß, J. (2005) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1650 · Cited by 1,283
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kuramoto Y, 1975, Lecture Notes in Physics No. 30, 420
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–354 of 354
Douw, L., Stam, C. J., Klein, M., Heimans, J. J., & Reijneveld, J. C. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511779145.009 · Cited by 2
Dynamic Communication and Connectivity in Frontal Networks
Voytek, B., & Knight, R. T. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199791569.003.0028 · Cited by 2
Sporns, O. (2009) · World Scientific lecture notes in complex systems · doi:10.1142/9789812838803_0009 · Cited by 2
Self-citation(2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407908-3.00006-6 · Cited by 2
Yamashita, Y., & Tani, J. (2010) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/annotation/c580e39c-00bc-43a2-9b15-af71350f9d43 · Cited by 2
Linking Complex Alterations in Functional Network Connectivity to Disorders of Consciousness
Crone, J. S., & Monti, M. M. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55964-3_3 · Cited by 1
Nature-Based Solutions for Climate Change Mitigation
Dubey, P., & Roy, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-19740-5_8 · Cited by 1
Funktionserholung nach Schlaganfall
Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-29800-4_40 · Cited by 1
Hanayik, P. H. T. (2015) · Journal of Neurological Disorders · doi:10.4172/2329-6895.1000221 · Cited by 1
A Review on Researches of Brain Networks
燊, 涂. (2013) · Advances in Psychology · doi:10.12677/ap.2013.36042 · Cited by 1
Modeling the Impact of Lesions in the Brain
Lim, S. I., Hutchings, F., & Kaiser, M. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803784-3.00022-6 · Cited by 1
Sporns, O. (2014) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396460-1.00018-4 · Cited by 1
Self-citationCommute Time as a Method to Explore Brain Functional Connectomes
Sato, J. R., Sato, C. M., Silva, M. K. D. C., & Biazoli, C. E. (2018) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2018.0598 · Cited by 2
Bonkhoff, A. K., Rost, N. S., & Schirmer, M. D. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-85280-7.00022-1 · Cited by 1
Neural network analysis and its application in neurosurgical planning
van Dellen, E., Douw, L., Bosma, I., Heimans, J. J., Stam, C. J., & Reijneveld, J. C. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-0723-2_29 · Cited by 1
An information theoretic approach to EEG-fMRI integration
Ostwald, D. (2010) · University of Birmingham Institutional Research Archive (University of Birmingham) · Cited by 1
Monto, S. (2010) · Aaltodoc (Aalto University) · Cited by 1
Preparing for a second attack: a lesion simulation study on network resilience after strokePreprint
van Assche, M., Klug, J., Dirren, E., Richiardi, J., & Carrera, E. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.09.21.461167 · Cited by 1
Sub-Second Fluctuation between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Modes Distinguishes Diverse Human Brain StatesPreprint
Park, Y., Cha, Y.-H., Kim, H., Kim, Y., Woo, J. H., Cho, H., Mashour, G. A., Xu, T., Lee, U., Hong, S., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.03.12.642768 · Cited by 3
Self-citationLuppi, A. I., Milisav, F., Suárez, L. E., Shafiei, G., Vohryzek, J., Perl, Y. S., Ali, H., Rosas, F. E., Mediano, P. A. M., Mišić, B., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.04.05.647237 · Cited by 2
Mineração de dados em redes complexas: estrutura e dinâmica
de Arruda, G. F. (2013) · doi:10.11606/d.55.2013.tde-25062013-085958
Vargas, E. R. (2013) · Scholarship@Western (Western University)
Noise as a useful signal within the nervous system in neurorehabilitation
Mikołajewska, E., & Mikołajewski, D. (2013) · Bio-Algorithms and Med-Systems · doi:10.1515/bams-2013-0151
Upadhyay, N., Munivenkatappa, A., Devi, B. I., Subbakrishna, D. K., & Rajeswaran, J. (2014) · The Open Access Journal of Science and Technology · doi:10.11131/2014/101069
Bani-Ahmed, A. (2013) · KU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas)
McIntosh, A. R. (2011) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awr112
Neuroplasticity explained by broad-scale networks and modularity?
Martin, G. B., & Greenway, C. (2010)
Candebat, F. T., Suárez, I. D., & Pedrón, A. M. (2012) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)
Candebat, F. T., Suárez, I. D., Montoya, A., & Alfonso, J. B. Z. (2014)
Chen, X., Zhang, C., Li, Y., Huang, P., Lv, Q., Yu, W., Chen, S., Sun, B., & Wang, Z. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/203406
Characterisation of Functional Brain Networks underlying Cognitive Reasoning and Intelligence
Hearne, L. J. (2017) · The University of Queensland · doi:10.14264/uql.2018.95
Personalised network modelling in epilepsyPreprint
Wang, Y., Schroeder, G. M., Sinha, N., & Taylor, P. N. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.01024
Santos, B. A., Gomes, R. M., Barandiaran, X. E., & Husbands, P. (2022) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_01471
Chakraborty, P., Kumar, S., Naskar, A., Banerjee, A., & Roy, D. (2021) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2021.11.29.470424
de Haan, W. (2012) · Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)
(2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407908-3.10000-7
Noonan, M. P., Geddes, M. R., Mars, R. B., & Fellows, L. K. (2022) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-022-02570-2
Understanding Apraxia Going Forward
Wasserman, T. H., & Wasserman, L. D. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24105-5_11
Treatment for Apraxia: Plasticity and Regeneration
Wasserman, T. H., & Wasserman, L. D. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24105-5_10
Neuropsychological Assessment of Apraxia: Where Network Reality and Domain Assessment Collide
Wasserman, T. H., & Wasserman, L. D. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-24105-5_9
High modularity, more flexible and independent communication of brain networks after strokePreprint
Huai, Z., Yu, X., Wu, K., Li, Y., Chen, C., Zhu, C., & Yue, S. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3570871/v1
Stroke-induced slow oscillations in dynamic brain organizationPreprint
Tscherpel, C., Mustin, M., Rosjat, N., Ziemann, U., Fink, G. R., Daun, S., & Grefkes, C. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.04.07.24305437
Brain Plasticity and Neurosurgery
Maldonado, I. L. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-59838-8_2
Venkatraman, A., Viswanathan, A., & Rao, S. S. (2025) · Biosemiotics · doi:10.1007/s12304-024-09592-9
From computational models to clinical practice: Whole brain modelling in stroke research
Drost, B. J. N. M., Sharma, V., & Tiesinga, P. H. E. (2025) · Open Research Europe · doi:10.12688/openreseurope.21294.1
Gaglioti, G., Cardinale, A., Lupo, C., Nieus, T. R., Marmoreo, F., Focacci, E., Gutzen, R., Denker, M., Pigorini, A., Massimini, M., et al. (2026) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2026.132735
Development of a computational and neuroinformatics framework for large-scale brain modelling
Sanz‐Leon, P. (2014) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/95aa5361zb69ez4251z8f52zdb68cf9af526
Maksimova, M. Y., & Айрапетова, А. С. (2026) · Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council · doi:10.21518/ms2026-128
Takao, N., Oishi, N., Dai, Q., Yao, L., Yoshimura, S., Shibata, M., Aki, M., Akahori, S., Spantios, M., Murai, T., et al. (2026) · Comprehensive Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2026.152725
Sub-second fluctuations between top-down and bottom-up modes distinguish diverse human brain states
Park, Y., Cha, Y.-H., Kim, H., Kim, Y., Woo, J. H., Lee, J., Cho, H., Mashour, G. A., Xu, T., Lee, U., et al. (2026) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2026.06.014 · Cited by 1
Self-citationFAIRsharing record for: Brainstem Connectome
FAIRsharing Team, & Schmitt, O. (2018) · FAIRsharing.org · doi:10.25504/fairsharing.hd7sxq
Metadata
- Authors
- Honey, C. J., & Sporns, O.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04-25
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 802-809
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6870962
- OpenAlex
- W2105504969
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 9.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation
- Keywords
- cortical lesions, cortical oscillations, neural mass model, directed information flow, network synchronization, structural connectivity, network clustering, parietal cortex, frontal cortex
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Macaca, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
