The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining the face processing network: Optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI
Open accessAbstract
Functional localizers that contrast brain signal when viewing faces versus objects are commonly used in functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of face processing. However, current protocols do not reliably show all regions of the core system for face processing in all subjects when conservative statistical thresholds are used, which is problematic in the study of single subjects. Furthermore, arbitrary variations in the applied thresholds are associated with inconsistent estimates of the size of face‐selective regions‐of‐interest (ROIs). We hypothesized that the use of more natural dynamic facial images in localizers might increase the likelihood of identifying face‐selective ROIs in individual subjects, and we also investigated the use of a method to derive the statistically optimal ROI cluster size independent of thresholds. We found that dynamic facial stimuli were more effective than static stimuli, identifying 98% (versus 72% for static) of ROIs in the core face processing system and 69% (versus 39% for static) of ROIs in the extended face processing system. We then determined for each core face processing ROI, the cluster size associated with maximum statistical face‐selectivity, which on average was approximately 50 mm 3 for the fusiform face area, the occipital face area, and the posterior superior temporal sulcus. We suggest that the combination of (a) more robust face‐related activity induced by a dynamic face localizer and (b) a cluster‐size determination based on maximum face‐selectivity increases both the sensitivity and the specificity of the characterization of face‐related ROIs in individual subjects. Hum Brain Mapp 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate
Genovese, C. R., Lazar, N. A., & Nichols, T. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.1037 · Cited by 4,923
The distributed human neural system for face perception
Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0 · Cited by 4,891
Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/372669a0 · Cited by 2,360
Human Experimentation: Code of Ethics of W.M.A
(1964) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.2.5402.177 · Cited by 1,449
Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex
Perrett, D. I., Rolls, E. T., & Caan, W. (1982) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00239352 · Cited by 1,385
Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements
Puce, A., Allison, T., Bentin, S., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-06-02188.1998 · Cited by 1,077
The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification
Grill-Spector, K., Knouf, N., & Kanwisher, N. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1224 · Cited by 982
Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces
Gobbini, M. I., & Haxby, J. V. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.015 · Cited by 958
The fusiform “face area” is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level
Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900562165 · Cited by 859
Cited by
Function in the human connectome: task-fMRI and individual differences in behavior
Barch, D. M., Burgess, G. C., Harms, M. P., Petersen, S. E., Schlaggar, B. L., Corbetta, M., Glasser, M. F., Curtiss, S., Dixit, S., Feldt, C., et al. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.033 · Cited by 1,529
(2016) · doi:10.3389/fpsyg · Cited by 801
Connectivity‐based parcellation: Critique and implications
Eickhoff, S. B., Thirion, B., Varoquaux, G., & Bzdok, D. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22933 · Cited by 273
Rossion, B., Hanseeuw, B., & Dricot, L. (2012) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.01.001 · Cited by 269
White-Matter Connectivity between Face-Responsive Regions in the Human Brain
Gschwind, M., Pourtois, G., Schwartz, S., Van De Ville, D., & Vuilleumier, P. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr226 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, C. J., Iaria, G., & Barton, J. J. S.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-07-25
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1637-1651
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W2117331609
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 57
- FWCI
- 6.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining the face processing network: Optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.20630
- The paper
- Fox, C. J., Iaria, G., & Barton, J. J. S. (2009). Defining the face processing network: Optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20630
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.