Cited by 42Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Association between white matter fiber structure and reward‐related reactivity of the ventral striatum

Open access
Koch, Kathrin, Wagner, Gerd, Schachtzabel, Claudia, Schultz, C. Christoph, Güllmar, Daniel, Reichenbach, Jürgen R., Sauer, Heinrich, Zimmer, Claus +1 more·2014·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Individual responsiveness to rewards or rewarding stimuli may affect various domains of normal as well as pathological behavior. The ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens (NAcc) constitutes a key brain structure in the regulation of reward‐appetitive behavior. It remains unclear, however, to which extent individual reward‐related BOLD response in the NAcc is dependent on individual characteristics of connecting white matter fiber tracts. Using tract‐based spatial statistics (TBSS) and statistical parametric mapping (SPM) this combined DTI ‐ fMRI study investigated this question by correlating NAcc BOLD signal upon receipt of a monetary reward with different white matter characteristics (FA, axial diffusivity, radial diffusivity). The results show that increased integrity of white matter as assessed by FA in the cingulate and corpus callosum, the inferior fronto‐occipital fasciculus, the anterior thalamic radiation and the anterior limb of the internal capsule was positively correlated with reward‐related activation in the NAcc. There were no negative correlations as well as no significant results regarding axial and radial diffusivity. These findings indicate that microstructural properties of fiber tracts connecting, amongst others, the cortex with the striatum may influence intensity of reward‐related responsiveness of the ventral striatum by constraining or increasing efficiency in information transfer within relevant circuitries involved in processing of reward. Hum Brain Mapp 35:1469–1476, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.22284

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Friedman DP, Aggleton JP, Saunders RC (2002): Comparison of hippocampal, amygdala, and perirhinal projections to the nucleus accumbens: Combined anterograde and retrograde tracing study in the Macaque brain. J Comp Neurol 450:345-365.
  2. Mori S, van Zijl PCM, Wakana S, Nagae-Poetscher LM (2005): MRI atlas of human white matter. Oxford: Elsevier Books.
  3. Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN (2006): Fiber Pathways of the Brain. Oxford: Oxfort University Press.
  4. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, Bannister PR, De Luca M, Drobnjak I, Flitney DE, Niazy RK, Saunders J, Vickers J, Zhang Y, De Stefano N, Brady JM, Matthews PM (2004): Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage 23:S208-S219.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koch, K., Wagner, G., Schachtzabel, C., Schultz, C. C., Güllmar, D., Reichenbach, J. R., Sauer, H., Zimmer, C., & Schlösser, R. G. M.
Affiliations
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
  • Jena University Hospital (DE)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-04-24
Volume
35
Issue
4
Pages
1469-1476
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W1761882001
Cited by
42
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
ventral striatum, nucleus accumbens, reward processing, white matter microstructure, fractional anisotropy, corpus callosum, cingulate cortex, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, anterior thalamic radiation, internal capsule, individual differences, monetary rewards, diffusion tensor imaging, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Probability, Reward, Diffusion Tensor Imaging, Ventral Striatum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review