Cited by 50Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Neuroticism and conscientiousness respectively constrain and facilitate short‐term plasticity within the working memory neural network

Open access
Dima, Danai, Friston, Karl J., Stephan, Klaas E., Frangou, Sophia·2015·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Individual differences in cognitive efficiency, particularly in relation to working memory (WM), have been associated both with personality dimensions that reflect enduring regularities in brain configuration, and with short‐term neural plasticity, that reflects task‐related changes in brain connectivity. To elucidate the relationship of these two divergent mechanisms, we tested the hypothesis that personality dimensions, which reflect enduring aspects of brain configuration, inform about the neurobiological framework within which short‐term, task‐related plasticity, as measured by effective connectivity, can be facilitated or constrained. As WM consistently engages the dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPFC), parietal (PAR), and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), we specified a WM network model with bidirectional, ipsilateral, and contralateral connections between these regions from a functional magnetic resonance imaging dataset obtained from 40 healthy adults while performing the 3‐back WM task. Task‐related effective connectivity changes within this network were estimated using Dynamic Causal Modelling. Personality was evaluated along the major dimensions of Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness. Only two dimensions were relevant to task‐dependent effective connectivity. Neuroticism and Conscientiousness respectively constrained and facilitated neuroplastic responses within the WM network. These results suggest individual differences in cognitive efficiency arise from the interplay between enduring and short‐term plasticity in brain configuration. Hum Brain Mapp 36:4158–4163, 2015. © 2015 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.22906

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Barch DM, Smith E (2008): The cognitive neuroscience of working memory: Relevance to CNTRICS and schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry, 64: 11– 17. 18400207 PMC2483314
  2. Bjørnebekk A, Fjell AM, Walhovd KB, Grydeland H, Torgersen S, Westlye LT (2013): Neuronal correlates of the five factor model (FFM) of human personality: Multimodal imaging in a large healthy sample. Neuroimage 65: 194– 208. 23063449
  3. DeYoung CG, Hirsh JB, Shane MS, Papademetris X, Rajeevan N, Gray JR (2010): Testing predictions from personality neuroscience. Brain structure and the big five. Psychol Sci 21: 820– 828. 20435951 PMC3049165
  4. Dima D, Jogia J, Frangou S (2014): Dynamic Causal Modeling of load‐dependent modulation of effective connectivity within the verbal working memory network. Hum Brain Mapp 35: 3025– 3035. 24142432 PMC6869395
  5. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (2002): Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Non‐patient Edition (SCID‐I/NP). New York (NY): Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
  6. Forbes CE, Poore JC, Krueger F, Barbey AK, Solomon J, Grafman J (2014): The role of executive function and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the expression of neuroticism and conscientiousness. Soc Neurosci 9: 139– 151. 24405294
  7. Frangou S (2014): A systems neuroscience perspective of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Schizophr Bull 40: 523– 531. 24609453 PMC3984528
  8. Friston KJ, Harrison L, Penny W (2003): Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 19: 1273– 1302. 12948688
  9. Fujisawa S, Amarasingham A, Harrison MT, Buzsáki G (2008): Behavior‐dependent short‐term assembly dynamics in the medial prefrontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 11: 823– 833. 18516033 PMC2562676
  10. Fuster JM (2001): The prefrontal cortex: An update: Time is of the essence. Neuron 30: 319– 333. 11394996
  11. Gevins A, Smith ME (2000): Neurophysiological measures of working memory and individual differences in cognitive ability and cognitive style. Cereb Cortex 10: 829– 839. 10982744
  12. Goldman‐Rakic PS (1995): Cellular basis of working memory. Neuron 14: 477– 485. 7695894
  13. Goto Y, Yang CR, Otani S (2010): Functional and dysfunctional synaptic plasticity in prefrontal cortex: Roles in psychiatric disorders. Biol Psychiatry 67: 199– 207. 19833323
  14. Kapogiannis D, Sutin A, Davatzikos C, Costa P Jr, Resnick S (2013): The five factors of personality and regional cortical variability in the baltimore longitudinal study of aging. Hum Brain Mapp 34: 2829– 2840. 22610513 PMC3808519
  15. Hill AC, Laird AR, Robinson JL (2014): Gender differences in working memory networks: A BrainMap meta‐analysis. Biol Psychol 102: 18– 29. 25042764 PMC4157091
  16. Kumari V, ffytche DH, Williams SC, Gray JA (2004): Personality predicts brain responses to cognitive demands. J Neurosci 24: 10636– 10641. 15564579 PMC6730115
  17. Kruschwitz JD, Walter M, Varikuti D, Jensen J, Plichta MM, Haddad L, Grimm O, Mohnke S, Pöhland L, Schott B, Wold A, Mühleisen TW, Heinz A, Erk S, Romanczuk‐Seiferth N, Witt SH, Nöthen MM, Rietschel M, Meyer‐Lindenberg A, Walter H (2015): 5‐HTTLPR/rs25531 polymorphism and neuroticism are linked by resting state functional connectivity of amygdala and fusiform gyrus. Brain Struct Funct 220: 2373– 2385. 24874919
  18. Logothetis NK (2008): What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 453: 869– 878. 18548064
  19. Okun M, Naim A, Lampl I (2010): The subthreshold relation between cortical local field potential and neuronal firing unveiled by intracellular recordings in awake rats. J Neurosci 30: 4440– 4448. 20335480 PMC6634481
  20. Rottschy C, Langner R, Dogan I, Reetz K, Laird AR, Schulz JB, Fox PT, Eickhoff SB (2012): Modelling neural correlates of working memory: A coordinate‐based meta‐analysis. Neuroimage 60: 830– 846. 22178808 PMC3288533
  21. Salinas E, Sejnowski TJ (2001): Gain Modulation in the Central Nervous System: Where Behavior, Neurophysiology, and Computation Meet. Neuroscientist 7: 430– 440. 11597102 PMC2887717
  22. Schmidt A, Diwadkar VA, Smieskova R, Harrisberger F, Lang UE, McGuire P, Fusar‐Poli P, Borgwardt S (2015): Approaching a network connectivity‐driven classification of the psychosis continuum: A selective review and suggestions for future research. Front Hum Neurosci 8: 1047. 25628553 PMC4292722
  23. Smith RE, Persyn D, Butler P (2011): Prospective memory, personality, and working memory: A Formal modeling approach. Z Psychol 219: 108– 116. 21822501 PMC3148583
  24. Stanley ML, Simpson SL, Dagenbach D, Lyday RG, Burdette, JH, Laurienti PJ (2015): Changes in brain network efficiency and working memory performance in aging. PLoS One 10: e0123950. 25875001 PMC4395305
  25. Stephan KE, Harrison LM, Kiebel SJ, David O, Penny WD, Friston KJ (2007): Dynamic causal models of neural system dynamics: Current state and future extensions. J Biosci 32: 129– 144. 17426386 PMC2636905
  26. Stephan KE, Penny WD, Daunizeau J, Moran RJ, Friston KJ (2009): Bayesian model selection for group studies. Neuroimage 46: 1004– 1017. 19306932 PMC2703732
  27. Wager TD, Smith EE (2003): Neuroimaging studies of working memory: A meta‐analysis. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 3: 255– 274. 15040547
  28. Wright CI, Williams D, Feczko E, Barrett LF, Dickerson BC, Schwartz CE, Wedig MM (2006): Neuroanatomical correlates of extraversion and neuroticism. Cereb Cortex 16: 1809– 1819. 16421327
  29. Wright CI, Feczko E, Dickerson BC, Williams D (2007): Neuroanatomical correlates of personality in the elderly. Neuroimage 35: 263– 272. 17229578 PMC1868480
  30. Young MS, Schinka JA (2001): Research Validity Scales for the NEO‐PI‐R: Additional evidence for reliability and validity. J Pers Assess 76: 412– 420. 11499455

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dima, D., Friston, K. J., Stephan, K. E., & Frangou, S.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Frangou, Sophia
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-07-20
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
4158-4163
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2162761992
Cited by
50
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (091593, 088130)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH104284)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
working memory, neuroticism, conscientiousness, effective connectivity, personality factors, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, 3-back task, dynamic causal modeling, brain network models
MeSH terms
Neuroticism, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Models, Neurological, Nerve Net, Neuronal Plasticity, Personality, Personality Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review