Cited by 26Physical Education and Sports StudiesHigher Education Governance and DevelopmentOrganizational Strategy and Culture

Organizational complexity: The athletics department and the university

Buer, Troy·2009·New Directions for Higher Education

Abstract

Institutions can manage the conflicts inherent in their academic and athletic identities through seeking synergies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/he.374

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buer, T.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Buer, Troy
Venue
New Directions for Higher Education
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-12
Volume
2009
Issue
148
Pages
109-116
ISSN
  • 0271-0560 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-0741
OpenAlex
W2075603380
Cited by
25
References
21
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Directions for Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Physical Education and Sports Studies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Higher Education Governance and Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Strategy and Culture
Keywords
organizational complexity, athletic departments, college athletics, synergistic effect, university administration, institutional identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review