Cited by 62Healthcare Policy and ManagementCrime Patterns and InterventionsLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems

The effect of health insurance on crime: Evidence from the Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion

Open access
He, Qiwei, Barkowski, Scott·2020·Health Economics

Abstract

Little evidence exists on the effect of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on criminal behavior, a gap in the literature that this paper seeks to address. Using a simple model, we argue we should anticipate a decrease in time devoted to criminal activities in response to the expansion, because the availability of the ACA Medicaid coverage raises the opportunity cost of crime. This prediction is particularly relevant for the ACA expansion because it primarily affects childless adults, a population likely to contain individuals who engage in criminal behavior. We validate this forecast empirically using a difference‐in‐differences framework, estimating the expansion's effects on panel datasets of state‐ and county‐level crime rates. Our estimates suggest that the ACA Medicaid expansion was negatively associated with burglary, vehicle theft, homicide, robbery, and assault. These crime‐reduction spillover effects represent an important offset to the government's cost burden for the ACA Medicaid expansion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hec.3977

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These papers support the implementation of the Earned Income Tax Credit and the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act as crime-reducing measures.

    “These papers support the implementation of the Earned Income Tax Credit and the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act as crime-reducing measures.82,84”
  • Several non-peer reviewed economic working papers and one paper published after the search evaluated the role of federal economic policies and were not included in the review.

    “Additionally, several non-peer reviewed economic working papers82,83 and one paper published after our search84 evaluated the role of federal economic policies were not included in our review.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 88 · Cited by 62

Authors
He, Q., & Barkowski, S.
Affiliations
  • China National Health Development Research Center (CN)
  • Clemson University (US)
Corresponding author
He, Qiwei
Venue
Health Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-01-06
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
261-277
ISSN
  • 1057-9230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1050
OpenAlex
W2780281362
Cited by
62
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TigerPrints (Clemson University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Keywords
Affordable Care Act, Medicaid expansion, health insurance, crime, criminal behavior, burglary, motor vehicle theft, homicide, robbery, assault, childless adults, spillover effects, crime rates
MeSH terms
Adult, Crime, Humans, Insurance, Health, Medicaid, United States, Insurance Coverage, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review