The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining the differences in income‐related health inequalities across European countries
Abstract
This paper provides new evidence on the sources of differences in the degree of income‐related inequalities in self‐assessed health in 13 European Union member states. It goes beyond earlier work by measuring health using an interval regression approach to compute concentration indices and by decomposing inequality into its determining factors. New and more comparable data were used, taken from the 1996 wave of the European Community Household Panel. Significant inequalities in health (utility) favouring the higher income groups emerge in all countries, but are particularly high in Portugal and — to a lesser extent — in the UK and in Denmark. By contrast, relatively low health inequality is observed in the Netherlands and Germany, and also in Italy, Belgium, Spain Austria and Ireland. There is a positive correlation with income inequality per se but the relationship is weaker than in previous research. Health inequality is not merely a reflection of income inequality. A decomposition analysis shows that the (partial) income elasticities of the explanatory variables are generally more important than their unequal distribution by income in explaining the cross‐country differences in income‐related health inequality. Especially the relative health and income position of non‐working Europeans like the retired and disabled explains a great deal of ‘excess inequality’. We also find a substantial contribution of regional health disparities to socio‐economic inequalities, primarily in the Southern European countries. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies.
Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y. (1997) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2955359 · Cited by 8,598
The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy
Deaton, A. (1997) · doi:10.1596/0-8018-5254-4 · Cited by 4,877
Cited by
Mortality, lifestyle and socio-economic status
Balia, S., & Jones, A. M. (2008) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.03.001 · Cited by 299
Analyzing Health Equity Using Household Survey Data
O’Donnell, O., van Doorslaer, E. K. A., Wagstaff, W., & Lindelöw, M. (2008) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · doi:10.13016/fcm7-vvv1 · Cited by 290
Self-citationWendt, C. (2009) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0958928709344247 · Cited by 256
The dynamics of physical and mental health in the older population
Ohrnberger, J., Fichera, E., & Sutton, M. (2017) · The Journal of the Economics of Ageing · doi:10.1016/j.jeoa.2016.07.002 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Doorslaer, E. V., & Koolman, X.
- Venue
- Health Economics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06-25
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 609-628
- ISSN
- 1057-9230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1050
- OpenAlex
- W2094449984
- Cited by
- 551
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining the differences in income‐related health inequalities across European countries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hec.918
- The paper
- Doorslaer, E. V., & Koolman, X. (2004). Explaining the differences in income‐related health inequalities across European countries. Health Economics. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.918
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.