Cited by 8,598Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth and Medical Studies

Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies.

Idler, Ellen L., Benyamini, Yael·1997·Journal of Health and Social Behavior

Abstract

We examine the growing number of studies of survey respondents' global self-ratings of health as predictors of mortality in longitudinal studies of representative community samples. Twenty-seven studies in U.S. and international journals show impressively consistent findings. Global self-rated health is an independent predictor of mortality in nearly all of the studies, despite the inclusion of numerous specific health status indicators and other relevant covariates known to predict mortality. We summarize and review these studies, consider various interpretations which could account for the association, and suggest several approaches to the next stage of research in this field.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2955359

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 33 highest quality studies, six (18%) found worse functioning among those who were more R/S.

    “Considering the 33 highest quality studies, 13 (39%) reported significantly better physical functioning among those who were more R/S (including one study at a trend level) [483–495], six (18%) found worse functioning [496–501], and five studies (15%) reported mixed results [82, 124, 502–504] (significant positive and negative associations, depending on R/S characteristic).”
  • Between Black and White individuals, age-adjusted death rates narrowed from 1993 to 2015, but the gap began widening after 2016.

    “Age-adjusted death rates by race and ethnicity between Black individuals and White individuals narrowed from 1993 to 2015, but since 2016 the gap began widening.”
  • Self-assessed health is a well-established index of morbidity and predictor of mortality.

    “Self-assessed health is a well-established index of morbidity and predictor of mortality.”

    From Education improves public health and promotes health equity (2015) · cites this paper as [33]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Idler, E. L., & Benyamini, Y.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Journal of Health and Social Behavior
Published
1997-03
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
21
ISSN
0022-1465 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996823741
Cited by
8,598
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 232 · 2025: 223 · 2024: 267 · 2023: 281 · 2022: 333 · 2021: 395 · 2020: 460 · 2019: 390 · 2018: 372 · 2017: 400 · 2016: 417 · 2015: 434 · 2014: 429 · 2013: 421 · 2012: 430
FWCI
67.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health and Social Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag011567-03)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG11567, AG03501)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Studies
Keywords
self-rated health, mortality, health indicators, community sample, longitudinal study, health behavior, mortality prediction
MeSH terms
Attitude to Health, Female, Health Status, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Mortality, United States, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review