The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The addition of mood and anxiety domains to the University of Washington quality of life scale
Abstract
Background: There are numerous head and neck specific quality of life questionnaires, each having its own merits and disadvantages. The University of Washington questionnaire has been widely used and is notable by the inclusion of a shoulder dysfunction domain, domain importance ratings, and patient free text. It is short, simple to process, and provides clinically relevant information. However, it has lacked any psychological dimension of quality of life. The aim of this study was to report the inclusion of two psychological domains (mood, anxiety) to the most recent refinement of the questionnaire (version 3). Method: A cross‐sectional survey was performed in April 2000. Questionnaires were sent to 183 patients alive and disease free after surgery for oral and oro‐pharyngeal malignancy. Replies were received from 145 patients (79% response rate). Results: The new domains (mood and anxiety) correlated significantly with the emotional functioning domains from the EORTC C30 and with the pain and appearance domains of UW‐QOL. There were also significant correlations between the “global quality of life” item and the two new domains. Mood (p = .005) and anxiety (p < .001) scores were associated with patient age but with no other clinicodemographic variable. Conclusion: The addition of mood and anxiety domains makes the UW‐QOL version 4 a single broad measure suitable for effective health‐related quality of life evaluation in the routine clinical setting. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 24: 521–529, 2002
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Aaronson, N. K., Ahmedzai, S., Bergman, B., Bullinger, M., Cull, A., Duez, N. J., Filiberti, A., Flechtner, H., Fleishman, S. B., Haes, J. C. J. M. D., et al. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 · Cited by 16,005
Performance of a Five-Item Mental Health Screening Test
Berwick, D. M., Murphy, J. M., Goldman, P. A., Ware, J. E., Barsky, A. J., & Weinstein, M. C. (1991) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199102000-00008 · Cited by 1,660
Case-finding for depression in primary care: a randomized trial∗
Williams, J. W., Mulrow, C. D., Kroenke, K., Dhanda, R., Badgett, R. G., Omori, D., & Lee, S. (1999) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00371-4 · Cited by 221
Cited by
Fear of recurrence among head and neck cancer survivors: longitudinal trends
Ghazali, N., Cadwallader, E., Lowe, D., Humphris, G., Ozakinci, G., & Rogers, S. N. (2013) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3069 · Cited by 150
Self-citationMillsopp, L., Brandom, L., Humphris, G., Lowe, D., Stat, C., & Rogers, S. (2006) · British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.07.017 · Cited by 79
Self-citationSemple, C. J., Dunwoody, L., Kernohan, W. G., & McCaughan, E. (2009) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-008-0480-7 · Cited by 54
Bonzanini, L. I. L., Soldera, E. B., Ortigara, G. B., Schulz, R. E., Antoniazzi, R. P., Ardenghi, T. M., & Ferrazzo, K. L. (2020) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-019-05008-4 · Cited by 29
Cerea, S., Sansoni, M., Scarzello, G., Groff, E., & Ghisi, M. (2022) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07334-6 · Cited by 15
Chen, S., Huang, B., Hung, T., Lin, C., & Chang, Y. (2019) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.4939 · Cited by 9
Fiedler, M., Brunnhuber, C., Eichberger, J., Gottsauner, M., Schuderer, J. G., Maurer, M., Taxis, J., Meier, J. K., Gerken, M., Reichert, T. E., et al. (2026) · Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery · doi:10.1055/a-2687-0316 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Rogers, S. N., Gwanne, S., Lowe, D., Humphris, G., Yueh, B., & Weymuller, E. A.
- Venue
- Head & Neck
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-05-31
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 521-529
- ISSN
- 1043-3074 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0347
- OpenAlex
- W2074710703
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
