Cited by 150Cancer survivorship and careHead and Neck Cancer StudiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Fear of recurrence among head and neck cancer survivors: longitudinal trends

Ghazali, Naseem, Cadwallader, Ella, Lowe, Derek, Humphris, Gerry, Ozakinci, Gozde, Rogers, Simon N.·2013·Psycho-Oncology

Abstract

Background: Fear of recurrence (FoR) following head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment is a major patient concern but is infrequently discussed in outpatient settings and may cause significant detrimental effect on patient psychological well‐being. Aim: The aim of this paper is to determine longitudinal trends and predictors of significant FoR. Method: Prospective data collection was obtained in 189 post‐treatment HNC patients with 456 clinic attendances from October 2008 to January 2011. All patients completed Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI), University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire version 4 and the FoR questionnaires using a combination of paper and touch‐screen technology. Results: The prevalence of significant FoR was 35%, which was stable longitudinally. Logistic regression‐delineated predictors of significant FoR were young age (<65 years), anxiety/mood and patient‐reported FoR. Conventional prognostic factors including standard clinicopathological factors, treatment modality and length of follow‐up did not predict significant FoR. Over time, 20% of patients reported significant FoR intermittently, whereas 30% experienced it consistently. The remaining 50% did not experience significant FoR. Discussion: Patient‐related characteristics were more important than clinicopathological prognostic factors in predicting significant FoR, potentially creating a mismatch between the doctors' perception of patient's experience of FoR with what patients may experience. In the long term, FoR is expressed across a spectrum extending from ‘normal’ FoR to persistent significant FoR with an intermediate category of intermittent significant FoR. Those patients experiencing intermittent and consistent levels of significant FoR may benefit from psychological support. This study confirmed that self‐reported screening FoR using the PCI is a valuable tool in identifying significant FoR. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/pon.3069

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghazali, N., Cadwallader, E., Lowe, D., Humphris, G., Ozakinci, G., & Rogers, S. N.
Affiliations
  • Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Edge Hill University (GB)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • School of Medicine University of St Andrews North Haugh, St Andrews UK
Corresponding author
Ghazali, Naseem
Venue
Psycho-Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-03-27
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
807-813
ISSN
  • 1057-9249 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1611
OpenAlex
W1622845597
Cited by
150
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psycho-Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
fear of recurrence, head and neck cancer, cancer survivors, longitudinal trends, psychological well-being, psychological support, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Age Factors, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Fear, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review