The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treatment and follow‐up of oral dysplasia — A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Abstract
Background.: The aim of this study was to inform an evidence‐based management policy for oral dysplastic lesions. Methods.: Systematic review was performed with meta‐analysis. Studies reporting follow‐up of patients with histologically confirmed oral dysplasia were included. Outcome measures included malignant transformation rate (MTR) and time to malignant transformation (TMT). Subgroup analysis was performed by histologic grade, clinical risk factors, and treatment modality. Heterogeneity was assessed. Results.: Fourteen nonrandomized studies, reporting on 992 patients, were included. There was considerable heterogeneity between studies: mean overall MTR = 12.1% (confidence interval: 8.1%, 17.9%) and mean TMT = 4.3 years. Histologic grade significantly affected mean MTR (p < .008). Lesions that were not excised demonstrated considerably higher MTR than those that were excised (p = .003). Conclusions.: Oral dysplasia showed a significant rate of transformation to cancer, which was related to grade and was decreased significantly but not eliminated by excision. This suggested the need for excision and continued surveillance. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck, 2009
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
Cited by
Prevalence of oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Mello, F. W., Miguel, A. F. P., Dutra, K. L., Porporatti, A. L., Warnakulasuriya, S., Guerra, E. N. S., & Rivero, E. R. C. (2018) · Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine · doi:10.1111/jop.12726 · Cited by 462
Dionne, K. R., Warnakulasuriya, S., Binti Zain, R., & Cheong, S. C. (2015) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.28754 · Cited by 248
Metadata
- Authors
- Mehanna, H. M., Rattay, T., Smith, J., & McConkey, C. C.
- Venue
- Head & Neck
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05-19
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1600-1609
- ISSN
- 1043-3074 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0347
- OpenAlex
- W2072894301
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment and follow‐up of oral dysplasia — A systematic review and meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hed.21131
- The paper
- Mehanna, H. M., Rattay, T., Smith, J., & McConkey, C. C. (2009). Treatment and follow‐up of oral dysplasia — A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Head & Neck. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.21131
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.