Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Mello, Fernanda Weber, Miguel, Andressa Fernanda Paza, Dutra, Kamile Leonardi, Porporatti, André Luís, Warnakulasuriya, Saman, Guerra, Eliete Neves Silva, Rivero, Elena Riet Correa·2018·Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine

Abstract

Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD) are chronic conditions, which have a higher risk of transformation to oral squamous cell carcinoma. The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to answer the question: “What is the prevalence of oral potentially malignant disorders among adults?” Studies reporting the prevalence of these conditions (leukoplakia, erythroplakia, oral submucous fibrosis [OSMF], and actinic cheilitis) were selected, only studies in which a clinical assessment and histopathological confirmation were performed were included. Of the 5513 studies, 22 met the inclusion criteria for qualitative and quantitative analyses. The risk of bias (RoB) of the selected studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data. Seven studies were classified as high risk, 12 as moderate risk, and 3 as low RoB. The meta‐analysis showed that the prevalence of OPMD was 4.47% (95% CI = 2.43‐7.08). The most prevalent OPMDs were OSMF (4.96%; 95% CI = 2.28‐8.62) and leukoplakia (4.11%; 95% CI = 1.98‐6.97). OPMDs were identified more commonly in males (59.99%; 95% CI = 41.27‐77.30). Asian and South American/Caribbean populations had the highest prevalence rates of 10.54% (95% CI = 4.60‐18.55) and 3.93% (95% CI = 2.43‐5.77), respectively. The overall prevalence of OPMD worldwide was 4.47%, and males were more frequently affected by these disorders. The prevalence of OPMD differs between populations; therefore, further population‐based studies may contribute to the better understanding of these differences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jop.12726

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Mello, F. W., Miguel, A. F. P., Dutra, K. L., Porporatti, A. L., Warnakulasuriya, S., Guerra, E. N. S., & Rivero, E. R. C.
Venue
Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-06-06
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
633-640
ISSN
  • 0300-9777 (ISSN-L)
  • 0904-2512
  • 1600-0714
OpenAlex
W2799990159
Cited by
462
References
19
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jop.12726
The paper
Mello, F. W., Miguel, A. F. P., Dutra, K. L., Porporatti, A. L., Warnakulasuriya, S., Guerra, E. N. S., & Rivero, E. R. C. (2018). Prevalence of oral potentially malignant disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12726

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.