Cited by 21Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

Enteral glutamine supplementation in surgical patients with head and neck malignancy: A randomized controlled trial

Azman, Mawaddah, Mohd Yunus, Mohd Razif, Sulaiman, Suhaina, Syed Omar, Syed Nabil·2015·Head & Neck

Abstract

Background: Glutamine supplementation is a novel approach to perioperative nutritional management. Methods: This study was a prospective randomized clinical trial of effects of enteral glutamine supplementation in surgical patients with head and neck malignancy in a tertiary center. This study measured the effects of supplementation within 4 weeks of the postoncologic surgical period in relation to fat‐free mass, serum albumin, and quality of life scores. Results: The study population consisted of 44 patients. There was significant difference in serum albumin (p < .001), fat‐free mass (p < .001), and quality of life scores (p < .05) between control and interventional groups. Significant correlation exists between fat‐free mass and quality of life score difference in our study population (p < .05). Conclusion: Enteral glutamine supplementation significantly improves fat‐free mass, serum albumin, and quality of life scores postoperatively and maintenance of lean body mass correlated with improved postoperative outcomes in terms of the patient's quality of life. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 37: 1799–1807, 2015

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hed.23839

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The efficiency of enteral GLN on infection reduction was also suggested in major trauma.

    “The efficiency of enteral GLN on infection reduction was also suggested in major trauma (219).”
  • Enteral GLN was shown to improve body composition and in particular lean body mass in a group of 44 head and neck cancer patients randomized to receive a GLN supplement (30 g daily) for four weeks.

    “Finally, enteral GLN was shown to improve body composition and in particular lean body mass in a group of 44 head and neck cancer patients randomized to receive a GLN supplement (30 g daily) for four weeks [81].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azman, M., Mohd Yunus, M. R., Sulaiman, S., & Syed Omar, S. N.
Affiliations
  • University Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (MY)
  • Department of Otorhinolaryngology Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Malaysia
  • National University of Malaysia (MY)
  • Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.
Corresponding author
Azman, Mawaddah
Venue
Head & Neck
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-06-20
Volume
37
Issue
12
Pages
1799-1807
ISSN
  • 1043-3074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0347
OpenAlex
W1951744689
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Head & Neck (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Fundamental Grant.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
glutamine supplementation, enteral nutrition, head and neck cancer, perioperative nutritional management, fat-free mass, serum albumin, quality of life, lean body mass, postoperative outcomes
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Female, Glutamine, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Hospitals, University, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Serum Albumin, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements, Perioperative Care, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review