Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 376

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The significance of “positive” margins in surgically resected epidermoid carcinomas

Looser, Kevin G., Shah, Jatin P., Strong, Elliot W.·1978·Head & Neck Surgery

Abstract

Sixty‐two patients with epidermoid carcinomas of the head and neck (excluding glottic larynx and skin), in whom surgical‐resection margins were classified as “positive,” were studied to determine the incidence of local recurrence, the subsequent clinical course, and survival. The recurrence rate in this group was compared with that of patients who had “negative” margins. Four histologic findings are classified as positive margins: (1) margin closeness (tumor within 0.5 cm), (2) premalignant change in the margin, (3) in‐situ cancer in the margin, and (4) invasive microscopic cancer at the margin. Patients with these variants showed a significant increase in local recurrence and in mortality when compared to those with negative margins. A review of the literature is presented, and recommendations are made for this clinical setting.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hed.2890010203

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 376

Metadata

Authors
Looser, K. G., Shah, J. P., & Strong, E. W.
Venue
Head & Neck Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1978-11
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
107-111
ISSN
  • 0148-6403 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-2398
OpenAlex
W2159390830
Cited by
376
References
0
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The significance of “positive” margins in surgically resected epidermoid carcinomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hed.2890010203
The paper
Looser, K. G., Shah, J. P., & Strong, E. W. (1978). The significance of “positive” margins in surgically resected epidermoid carcinomas. Head & Neck Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2890010203

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.