The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of Hydroxylation and Conjugation of Bile Salts on Their Membrane-Damaging Properties-Studies on Isolated Hepatocytes and Lipid Membrane Vesicles†
Abstract
To characterize the relative toxicity of different bile salts, isolated hepatocytes were incubated with different concentrations of one bile salt or with identical concentrations of different bile salts and their conjugates. Incubation lasted for 1 hr; samples were taken at different intervals and studied for enzyme release, urea synthesis and stimulation by glucagon, and by electron microscopy. While the trihydroxylated bile salt, taurocholate, did not produce alterations at concentrations up to 1,500 μM, the dihydroxylated salts, chenodeoxy- and deoxycholate, caused enzyme release and membrane lysis, and inhibited urea synthesis at concentrations above 500 μM. In contrast, urso-deoxycholate was ineffective at concentrations up to 1,500 μM. Conjugation of these bile salts did not result in significant differences with the exception of deoxycholate conjugates which induced enzyme leakage more rapidly. Studies of lipid membrane vesicles revealed corresponding alterations. The monohydroxylated salt, taurolithocholate, caused cellular damage as indicated by enzyme loss and impairment of hormonal sensitivity of cells at low concentrations (30 to 100 μM). Dihydroxylated salts produced a different time course of membrane leakage, ultrastructural changes and release of volume marker and lipid in liposomes, suggesting a possible different mechanism of damage induced by this bile salt. Both systems can readily be used to study bile salt membrane interactions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Continuing Importance of Bile Acids in Liver and Intestinal Disease
Hofmann, A. F. (1999) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.159.22.2647 · Cited by 982
Pathogenesis of liver fibrosis: role of oxidative stress
Poli, G. (2000) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0098-2997(00)00004-2 · Cited by 631
Laurin, J., Lindor, K. D., Crippin, J. S., Gossard, A., Gores, G. J., Ludwig, J., Rakela, J., & McGill, D. B. (1996) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.510230624 · Cited by 566
Quantitative estimation of the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of mixed bile salt solutions.
Heuman, D. M. (1989) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38331-0 · Cited by 553
IS URSODEOXYCHOLIC ACID AN EFFECTIVE TREATMENT FOR PRIMARY BILIARY CIRRHOSIS?
Poupon, R., Poupon, R., Calmus, Y., Chrétien, Y., Ballet, F., & Darnis, F. (1987) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(87)91610-2 · Cited by 536
Metadata
- Authors
- SchÖLmerich, J., Becher, M.-S., Schmidt, K., Schubert, R., Kremer, B., Feldhaus, S., & Gerok, W.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 661-666
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036433609
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of Hydroxylation and Conjugation of Bile Salts on Their Membrane-Damaging Properties-Studies on Isolated Hepatocytes and Lipid Membrane Vesicles†. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.1840040416
- The paper
- SchÖLmerich, J., Becher, M.-S., Schmidt, K., Schubert, R., Kremer, B., Feldhaus, S., & Gerok, W. (1984). Influence of Hydroxylation and Conjugation of Bile Salts on Their Membrane-Damaging Properties-Studies on Isolated Hepatocytes and Lipid Membrane Vesicles†. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840040416
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.