Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 553

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative estimation of the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of mixed bile salt solutions.

Open access
Heuman, D M·1989·Journal of Lipid Research

Abstract

This paper describes the derivation of a bile salt monomeric hydrophobicity index that quantitatively defines the composite hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of a mixture of bile salts. The index is based on the logarithms of bile salt capacity factors determined using reversed phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (stationary phase octadecyl silane; mobile phase methanol-water 70:30 w/w, ionic strength 0.15). It has been standardized arbitrarily to set indices of taurocholate and taurolithocholate to 0 and 1, respectively. Indices of tauroursodeoxycholate, taurohyodeoxycholate, taurochenodeoxycholate, and taurodeoxycholate were found to be -0.47, -0.35, +0.46, and +0.59, respectively. Whereas capacity factors and hydrophobicity indices of taurine-conjugated bile salts were constant for pH 2.8-9.0, the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of glycine-conjugated and unconjugated bile salts was strongly influenced by pH. At alkaline pH (greater than 8.5), hydrophobicity indices of fully ionized unconjugated (n = 4) and glycine-conjugated (n = 6) bile salts differed by only 0.14 +/- 0.02 and 0.05 +/- 0.01, respectively, from those of the corresponding taurine conjugates. At acid pH (less than 3.5) the hydrophobicity indices of four unconjugated bile acids (protonated form) exceeded those of the corresponding salts (ionized form) by 0.76 +/- 0.04; indices of six glycine-conjugated bile acids exceeded those of the corresponding salts by only 0.26 +/- 0.03. Capacity factors of the salt forms of cholate and its conjugates increased dramatically with increasing ionic strength of the mobile phase; retention of the protonated forms (cholic and glycocholic acids) was only minimally influenced by ionic strength. Thus the difference in hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance between a bile acid and its corresponding salt decreases with increasing ionic strength. Examples are given of calculation of hydrophobicity indices for biliary bile salts (fully ionized) from four species under conditions of intact enterohepatic circulation. Mean values, from least to most hydrophobic, were: rat (-0.31) less than dog (0.11) less than hamster (0.22) less than human (0.32). This study provides a rational basis for calculating the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of mixed bile salt solutions over a broad range of pH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38331-0

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 42 references

Cited by

See all 553

Metadata

Authors
Heuman, D. M.
Venue
Journal of Lipid Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-05
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
719-730
ISSN
0022-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1943976550
Cited by
553
References
42
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative estimation of the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of mixed bile salt solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38331-0
The paper
Heuman, D. M. (1989). Quantitative estimation of the hydrophilic-hydrophobic balance of mixed bile salt solutions. Journal of Lipid Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-2275(20)38331-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.