The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cefotaxime Is More Effective Than Is Ampicillin–Tobramycin in Cirrhotics With Severe Infections
Open accessAbstract
We compared the effectiveness and incidence of nephrotoxicity of ampicillin–tobramycin and cefotaxime in 73 cirrhotics who had severe bacterial infection. Most of these patients had spontaneous peritonitis and/or bacteremia. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups. Group I included 36 patients treated with ampicillin–tobramycin and Group II comprised 37 patients treated with cefotaxime. Patients from both groups were similar with respect to clinical data, standard liver and renal function tests, types of infection and isolated organisms. Ninety–two per cent of bacteria isolated in Group I and 98% of those isolated in Group II were susceptible in vitro to ampicillin–tobramycin and to cefotaxime, respectively. Ampicillin–tobramycin cured the infection in 56% of Group I patients, and cefotaxime in 85% of Group II patients (p < 0.02). Five patients treated with ampicillin–tobramycin, and none treated with cefotaxime developed superinfections (p = 0.024). Nephrotoxicity (impairment of renal function associated with an increase of urinary β 2–microglobulin to over 2,000 μg per liter) occurred in two patients in Group I and none in Group II. These results suggest that broad–spectrum cephalosporins should be considered as first choice antibiotics in cirrhotic patients with severe infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fernández, J., Navasa, M., Gómez, J., Colmenero, J., Vila, J., Arroyo, V., & Rodés, J. (2002) · Hepatology · doi:10.1053/jhep.2002.30082 · Cited by 954
Self-citationGinés, P., Rimola, A., Planas, R., Vargas, V., Marco, F., Almela, M., Forne, M., Miranda, M. L., Llach, J., Salmerón, J. M., et al. (1990) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.1840120416 · Cited by 627
Self-citationFernández, J., Acevedo, J., Castro, M., Garcia, O., de Lope, C. R., Roca, D., Pavesi, M., Sola, E., Moreira, L., Silva, A., et al. (2012) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.25532 · Cited by 620
Self-citationShort-course versus long-course antibiotic treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis
Runyon, B. A., McHutchison, J. G., Antillon, M. R., Akriviadis, E. A., & Montano, A. A. (1991) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/0016-5085(91)90677-d · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Felisart, J., Rimola, A., Arroyo, V., Perez-Ayuso, R. M., Quintero, E., Gines, P., & Rodes, J.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 1985-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 457-462
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057575003
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cefotaxime Is More Effective Than Is Ampicillin–Tobramycin in Cirrhotics With Severe Infections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.1840050319
- The paper
- Felisart, J., Rimola, A., Arroyo, V., Perez-Ayuso, R. M., Quintero, E., Gines, P., & Rodes, J. (1985). Cefotaxime Is More Effective Than Is Ampicillin–Tobramycin in Cirrhotics With Severe Infections. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840050319
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.