Cited by 620Liver Disease and TransplantationAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaNosocomial Infections in ICU

Prevalence and risk factors of infections by multiresistant bacteria in cirrhosis: A prospective study

Open access
Fernández, Javier, Acevedo, Juan, Castro, Miriam, Garcia, Orlando, de Lope, Carlos Rodríguez, Roca, Daria, Pavesi, Marco, Sola, Elsa +7 more·2012·Hepatology

Abstract

Epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical effect of infections by multiresistant bacteria in cirrhosis are poorly known. This work was a prospective evaluation in two series of cirrhotic patients admitted with infection or developing infection during hospitalization. The first series was studied between 2005 and 2007 (507 bacterial infections in 223 patients) and the second between 2010 and 2011 (162 bacterial infections in 110 patients). In the first series, 32% of infections were community acquired (CA), 32% healthcare associated (HCA), and 36% nosocomial. Multiresistant bacteria (92 infections; 18%) were isolated in 4%, 14%, and 35% of these infections, respectively ( P < 0.001). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL - E ; n = 43) was the main multiresistant organism identified, followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 17), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (n = 14), and Enterococcus faecium (n = 14). The efficacy of currently recommended empirical antibiotic therapy was very low in nosocomial infections (40%), compared to HCA and CA episodes (73% and 83%, respectively; P < 0.0001), particularly in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, urinary tract infection, and pneumonia (26%, 29%, and 44%, respectively). Septic shock (26% versus 10%; P < 0.0001) and mortality rate (25% versus 12%; P = 0.001) were significantly higher in infections caused by multiresistant strains. Nosocomial origin of infection (hazard ratio [HR], 4.43), long-term norfloxacin prophylaxis (HR, 2.69), recent infection by multiresistant bacteria (HR, 2.45), and recent use of β-lactams (HR, 2.39) were independently associated with the development of multiresistant infections. Results in the second series were similar to those observed in the first series. Conclusions : Multiresistant bacteria, especially ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae , are frequently isolated in nosocomial and, to a lesser extent, HCA infections in cirrhosis, rendering third-generation cephalosporins clinically ineffective. New antibiotic strategies tailored according to the local epidemiological patterns are needed for the empirical treatment of nosocomial infections in cirrhosis. (Hepatology 2012)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.25532

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A major problem with norfloxacin is the development of antibiotic resistance.

    “A major problem with the use of norfloxacin is the development of antibiotic resistance110–112, suggesting that it might be suitable for treatment lasting weeks to months but not for long-term or life-long application in patients with cirrhosis.”
  • Norfloxacin may be suitable for weeks to months of treatment but not for long-term or life-long use in cirrhosis patients.

    “A major problem with the use of norfloxacin is the development of antibiotic resistance110–112, suggesting that it might be suitable for treatment lasting weeks to months but not for long-term or life-long application in patients with cirrhosis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Merli M, Lucidi C, Giannelli V, Giusto M, Riggio O, Falcone M, et al. Cirrhotic patients are at risk for HCA bacterial infections. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:979-985.
  2. Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas, and Ben- nett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 7th ed. Philadel- phia, PA: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2010.
  3. Valenti WM, Chiarello LA. Overview of hospital infection control and noso- comial infections. In: Resse RE, Douglas RG, Jr., eds. A Practical Approach to Infectious Diseases. Boston, MA: Lippincott; 1986:545-555.
  4. Guidelines for the management of adults with hospital-acquired, venti- lator-associated, and healthcare-associated pneumonia. American Tho- racic Society; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:388-416.
  5. Apisarnthanarak A, Bailey TC, Fraser VJ. Duration of stool coloni- zation in patients infected with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase- producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. CID 2008;46: 1322-1323.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernández, J., Acevedo, J., Castro, M., Garcia, O., de Lope, C. R., Roca, D., Pavesi, M., Sola, E., Moreira, L., Silva, A., Seva-Pereira, T., Corradi, F., Mensa, J., Ginès, P., & Arroyo, V.
Affiliations
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Fernández, Javier
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2012-05
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
1551-1561
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989550571
Cited by
620
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 13
FWCI
17.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hepatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundación BBVA
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (FI09/00510)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Keywords
multidrug-resistant bacteria, liver cirrhosis, bacterial infection, nosocomial infections, community-acquired infections, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase, ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecium, empirical antibiotic therapy, septic shock, mortality, risk factors, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection
MeSH terms
Aged, Bacterial Infections, beta-Lactamases, Cross Infection, Enterobacteriaceae, Female, Gram-Negative Bacteria, Gram-Positive Bacteria, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Spain, Cohort Studies, Prevalence, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis, Community-Acquired Infections, Statistics, Nonparametric, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review