Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Natural History of Small Untreated Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhosis: A Multivariate Analysis of Prognostic Factors of Tumor Growth Rate and Patient Survival

Open access
Barbara, Luigi, Benzi, Giovanna, Gaiani, Stefano, Fusconi, Fabio, Zironi, Gianni, Siringo, Sebastiano, Rigamonti, Alessandra, Barbara, Carlotta, Grigioni, Walter, Mazziotti, Alighieri, Bolondi, Luigi·1992·Hepatology

Abstract

We analyzed the growth pattern of tumor masses and the survival of 39 asymptomatic Italian patients with a total of 59 small (≤ 5 cm in diameter) hepatocellular carcinomas arising from cirrhosis. The total length of the observation period ranged from 90 to 962 days, with an average of 364 ± 229 (mean ± S.D.). Doubling time ranged from 27.2 to 605.6 days (mean ± S.D., 204.2 ± 135; median = 171.6 days). Three different growth patterns were recognized: (a) tumors with no or very slow initial growth pattern (doubling time > 200 days), 10 cases (37%); (b) tumors with declining growth rate over time, 9 cases (33.4%); and (c) tumors with almost constant growth rate, 8 cases (29.6%). Using the stepwise discriminant analysis, we found a score based on albumin, alcohol intake, number of nodules, echo pattern and histological type that allowed a correct prediction of short doubling time (≤ 150 days) in 55.6%, medium doubling time (151 to 300 days) in 60% and long doubling time (>300 days) in 100% of cases. The estimated survival rate of the 39 patients, calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method was 81% at 1 yr, 55.7% at 2 yr and 21% at 3 yr. Stepwise discriminant analysis showed that a score based on sex, HBsAg status, alcohol consumption, ascites, γ–glutamyltranspeptidase, prothrombin time, Child–Pugh class and all the sonographical parameters could predict 2–yr survival in 100% of cases. We conclude that great variability of growth patterns exists among and within small hepatocellular carcinomas. Prediction of subsequent growth rate is unreliable in most cases. The sonographical characteristics, together with the histological features, can, however, help in identifying cases with long doubling time (>300 days). The discriminant analysis on survival of cirrhotic patients with small hepatocellular carcinomas demonstrates that the underlying liver disease plays a key role in the long–term survival probability. (Hepatology 1992;16:132-137.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.1840160122

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Barbara, L., Benzi, G., Gaiani, S., Fusconi, F., Zironi, G., Siringo, S., Rigamonti, A., Barbara, C., Grigioni, W., Mazziotti, A., & Bolondi, L.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
1992-07
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
132-137
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032660643
Cited by
431
References
22
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural History of Small Untreated Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhosis: A Multivariate Analysis of Prognostic Factors of Tumor Growth Rate and Patient Survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.1840160122
The paper
Barbara, L., Benzi, G., Gaiani, S., Fusconi, F., Zironi, G., Siringo, S., Rigamonti, A., Barbara, C., Grigioni, W., Mazziotti, A., & Bolondi, L. (1992). Natural History of Small Untreated Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhosis: A Multivariate Analysis of Prognostic Factors of Tumor Growth Rate and Patient Survival. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840160122

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.