The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamics of normal and injured human liver regeneration after hepatectomy as assessed on the basis of computed tomography and liver function
Open accessAbstract
We compared liver volume and function kinetics after partial hepatectomy according to extent of resection and severity of coexisting liver disease in 57 adults with uneventful postoperative courses. Liver volume and massiveness of resection, or resection rate, were estimated on computed tomography. Patients were categorized into three groups on the basis of reaction rate: small (<30%), medium (30%-50%) and large (>50%). The regenerative patterns of normal livers in the medium and large groups consisted of three phases: a rapid increase during the first month, some decrease in the second month and a final, slower increase. This contrasted with the pattern of injured livers with chronic hepatitis or cirrhosis, which generally showed a phase of less rapid, gradual increase. The regeneration rate (volume gain, cm 3/day) during the first month was found to be proportional to resection rate in the presence or absence of liver disease. Normal livers regenerated at least twice as rapidly as injured livers in patients with comparable resection rates. Normal livers reached plateau levels within 1 to 2 mo regardless of the massiveness of resection, whereas regeneration took 3 to 5 mo in injured livers. Liver function (albumin, bilirubin) recovered concomitantly with liver volume in the medium group, whereas in the large group they generally returned to their initial values behind volume restoration, particularly in cirrhotic patients. In conclusion, human liver regeneration is strongly influenced by the massiveness of the resection and presence of coexisting liver disease. However, we found that some cirrhotic livers can regenerate, albeit more slowly and less completely, as long as the extent of hepatectomy remains within safe functional limits. (Hepatology 1993;18:79-85).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
IMPACT OF GRAFT SIZE MISMATCHING ON GRAFT PROGNOSIS IN LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FROM LIVING DONORS1,2
Kiuchi, T., Kasahara, M., Uryuhara, K., Inomata, Y., Uemoto, S., Asonuma, K., Egawa, H., Fujita, S., Hayashi, M., & Tanaka, K. (1999) · Transplantation · doi:10.1097/00007890-199901270-00024 · Cited by 961
Vauthey, J.-N., Chaoui, A., Do, K.-A., Bilimoria, M. M., Fenstermacher, M. J., Charnsangavej, C., Hicks, M., Alsfasser, G., Lauwers, G., Hawkins, I. F., et al. (2000) · Surgery · doi:10.1067/msy.2000.105294 · Cited by 697
Portal vein embolization: rationale, technique and future prospects
Abdalla, E. K., Hicks, M. E., & Vauthey, J. N. (2001) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01658.x · Cited by 425
Kokudo, N., Tada, K., Seki, M., Ohta, H., Azekura, K., Ueno, M., Ohta, K., Yamaguchi, T., Matsubara, T., Takahashi, T., et al. (2001) · Hepatology · doi:10.1053/jhep.2001.26513 · Cited by 339
Comparative regenerative mechanisms across different mammalian tissues
Iismaa, S. E., Kaidonis, X., Nicks, A. M., Bogush, N., Kikuchi, K., Naqvi, N., Harvey, R. P., Husain, A., & Graham, R. M. (2018) · npj Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41536-018-0044-5 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Yamanaka, N., Okamoto, E., Kawamura, E., Kato, T., Oriyama, T., Fujimoto, J., Furukawa, K., Tanaka, T., Tomoda, F., & Tanaka, W.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 1993-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-85
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056987962
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of normal and injured human liver regeneration after hepatectomy as assessed on the basis of computed tomography and liver function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.1840180114
- The paper
- Yamanaka, N., Okamoto, E., Kawamura, E., Kato, T., Oriyama, T., Fujimoto, J., Furukawa, K., Tanaka, T., Tomoda, F., & Tanaka, W. (1993). Dynamics of normal and injured human liver regeneration after hepatectomy as assessed on the basis of computed tomography and liver function. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840180114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.