The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accuracy of liver stiffness measurement for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver diseases
Abstract
A proper diagnosis of cirrhosis is essential for the management of patients with chronic liver diseases. We assessed the accuracy of liver stiffness measurement by Fibroscan for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in 1,257 patients with chronic liver diseases of various causes enrolled in a prospective multicenter study as well as clarified causes of discrepancies between liver histology and Fibroscan. One hundred thirty-two patients had unsuitable biopsy specimens, and 118 had unreliable liver stiffness measurements. Because 232 patients overlapped with a previous study, analysis was performed in the 775 new patients then derived in the whole population (1,007; 165 cirrhosis). Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis. Liver samples were re-analyzed in case of discrepancies. The area under the ROC (AUROC) was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.96) for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in either 775 or 1,007 patients. The cutoff value with optimal diagnosis accuracy was 14.6 kPa in 1,007 patients (positive and negative predictive values, 74% and 96%) with discrepancies among the etiological groups. Eighty patients were misclassified: (1) among 45 patients without cirrhosis with liver stiffness 14.6 kPa or greater, 27 (60%) had extensive fibrosis and 10 (22%) significant perisinusoidal fibrosis; and (2) among 35 patients with cirrhosis and liver stiffness less than 14.6 kPa, 10 (29%) had a macronodular pattern and 25 (71%) either none or mild activity. In conclusion , Fibroscan is a reliable method for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver diseases, better at excluding than at predicting cirrhosis using a threshold of 14.6 kPa. False-negatives are mainly attributable to inactive or macronodular cirrhosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2015) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.006 · Cited by 1,875
Extrahepatic cholestasis increases liver stiffness (FibroScan) irrespective of fibrosis
Millonig, G., Reimann, F. M., Friedrich, S., Fonouni, H., Mehrabi, A., Büchler, M. W., Seitz, H. K., & Mueller, S. (2008) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.22577 · Cited by 599
Liver stiffness: a novel parameter for the diagnosis of liver disease
Mueller, S. (2010) · Hepatic Medicine: Evidence and Research · doi:10.2147/hmer.s7394 · Cited by 434
Mikolasevic, I., Orlic, L., Franjic, N., Hauser, G., Stimac, D., & Milic, S. (2016) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v22.i32.7236 · Cited by 273
Elastography imaging: the 30 year perspective
Ormachea, J., & Parker, K. J. (2020) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/abca00 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Ganne-Carrié, N., Ziol, M., de Ledinghen, V., Douvin, C., Marcellin, P., Castera, L., Dhumeaux, D., Trinchet, J.-C., & Beaugrand, M.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1511-1517
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050449588
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of liver stiffness measurement for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver diseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.21420
- The paper
- Ganne-Carrié, N., Ziol, M., de Ledinghen, V., Douvin, C., Marcellin, P., Castera, L., Dhumeaux, D., Trinchet, J.-C., & Beaugrand, M. (2006). Accuracy of liver stiffness measurement for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver diseases. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21420
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.