Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 297

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A 7 gene signature identifies the risk of developing cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C†

Open access
Huang, Hongjin, Shiffman, Mitchell L., Friedman, Scott, Venkatesh, Ramasubbu, Bzowej, Natalie, Abar, Olivia T., Rowland, Charles M., Catanese, Joseph J., Leong, Diane U., Sninsky, John J., Layden, Thomas J., Wright, Teresa L., White, Thomas, Cheung, Ramsey C.·2007·Hepatology

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Clinical factors such as age, gender, alcohol use, and age-at-infection influence the progression to cirrhosis but cannot accurately predict the risk of developing cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The aim of this study was to develop a predictive signature for cirrhosis in Caucasian patients. All patients had well-characterized liver histology and clinical factors; DNA was extracted from whole blood for genotyping. We validated all significant markers from a genome scan in the training cohort, and selected 361 markers for the signature building. Using a "machine learning" approach, a signature consisting of markers most predictive for cirrhosis risk in Caucasian patients was developed in the training set (N = 420). The Cirrhosis Risk Score (CRS) was calculated to estimate the risk of developing cirrhosis for each patient. The CRS performance was then tested in an independently enrolled validation cohort of 154 Caucasian patients. A CRS signature consisting of 7 markers was developed for Caucasian patients. The area-under-the-ROC curves (AUC) of the CRS was 0.75 in the training cohort. In the validation cohort, AUC was only 0.53 for clinical factors, increased to 0.73 for CRS, and 0.76 when CRS and clinical factors were combined. A low CRS cutoff of <0.50 to identify low-risk patients would misclassify only 10.3% of high-risk patients, while a high cutoff of >0.70 to identify high-risk patients would misclassify 22.3% of low-risk patients. CONCLUSION: CRS is a better predictor than clinical factors in differentiating high-risk versus low-risk for cirrhosis in Caucasian CHC patients. Prospective studies should be conducted to further validate these findings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.21695

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 297

Metadata

Authors
Huang, H., Shiffman, M. L., Friedman, S., Venkatesh, R., Bzowej, N., Abar, O. T., Rowland, C. M., Catanese, J. J., Leong, D. U., Sninsky, J. J., Layden, T. J., Wright, T. L., White, T., & Cheung, R. C.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2007-08
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
297-306
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013101192
Cited by
297
References
2
FWCI
15.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 7 gene signature identifies the risk of developing cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C†. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.21695
The paper
Huang, H., Shiffman, M. L., Friedman, S., Venkatesh, R., Bzowej, N., Abar, O. T., Rowland, C. M., Catanese, J. J., Leong, D. U., Sninsky, J. J., Layden, T. J., Wright, T. L., White, T., & Cheung, R. C. (2007). A 7 gene signature identifies the risk of developing cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C†. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21695

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.