Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recombinant factor VIIa for variceal bleeding in patients with advanced cirrhosis: A randomized, controlled trial

Bosch, Jaime, Thabut, Dominique, Albillos, Agustín, Carbonell, Nicolas, Spicak, Julius, Massard, Julien, D'Amico, Gennaro, Lebrec, Didier, de Franchis, Roberto, Fabricius, Sφren, Cai, Yan, Bendtsen, Flemming·2008·Hepatology

Abstract

A beneficial effect of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) in Child-Pugh class B and C patients with cirrhosis who have variceal bleeding has been suggested. This randomized controlled trial assessed the efficacy and safety of rFVIIa in patients with advanced cirrhosis and active variceal bleeding. At 31 hospitals in an emergency setting, 256 patients (Child-Pugh > 8; Child-Pugh B = 26%, C = 74%) were randomized equally to: placebo; 600 μg/kg rFVIIa (200 + 4× 100 μg/kg); or 300 μg/kg rFVIIa (200 + 100 μg/kg). Dosing was intravenous at 0, 2, 8, 14, and 20 hours after endoscopy, in addition to standard vasoactive, prophylactic antibiotic, and endoscopic treatment. The primary composite endpoint consisted of failure to control 24-hour bleeding, or failure to prevent rebleeding or death at day 5. Secondary endpoints included adverse events and 42-day mortality. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Administration of rFVIIa had no significant effect on the composite endpoint compared with placebo ( P = 0.37). There was no significant difference in 5-day mortality between groups; however, 42-day mortality was significantly lower with 600 μg/kg rFVIIa compared with placebo (odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval = 0.13–0.74), and bleeding-related deaths were reduced from 12% (placebo) to 2% (600 μg/kg). A marked heterogeneity in the failure rate in all treatment groups was observed across participating centers. Adverse events, including overall thromboembolic events, were comparable between groups. Conclusion: Treatment with rFVIIa had no significant effect on the primary composite endpoint compared with placebo. Therefore, decision on the use of this hemostatic agent in acute variceal bleeding should be carefully considered, because results of this study do not support the routine use of rFVIIa in this setting. Adverse events were comparable across groups.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.22216

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Bosch, J., Thabut, D., Albillos, A., Carbonell, N., Spicak, J., Massard, J., D'Amico, G., Lebrec, D., de Franchis, R., Fabricius, S., Cai, Y., & Bendtsen, F.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2008-05
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
1604-1614
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978745785
Cited by
303
References
23
FWCI
13.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recombinant factor VIIa for variceal bleeding in patients with advanced cirrhosis: A randomized, controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.22216
The paper
Bosch, J., Thabut, D., Albillos, A., Carbonell, N., Spicak, J., Massard, J., D'Amico, G., Lebrec, D., de Franchis, R., Fabricius, S., Cai, Y., & Bendtsen, F. (2008). Recombinant factor VIIa for variceal bleeding in patients with advanced cirrhosis: A randomized, controlled trial. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22216

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.