Simplified criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: Diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may be challenging. However, early diagnosis is important because immunosuppression is life-saving. Diagnostic criteria of the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) were complex and purely meant for scientific purposes. This study of the IAIHG aims to define simplified diagnostic criteria for routine clinical practice. Candidate criteria included sex, age, autoantibodies, immunoglobulins, absence of viral hepatitis, and histology. The training set included 250 AIH patients and 193 controls from 11 centers worldwide. Scores were built from variables showing predictive ability in univariate analysis. Diagnostic value of each score was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The best score was validated using data of an additional 109 AIH patients and 284 controls. This score included autoantibodies, immunoglobulin G, histology, and exclusion of viral hepatitis. The area under the curve for prediction of AIH was 0.946 in the training set and 0.91 in the validation set. Based on the ROC curves, two cutoff points were chosen. The score was found to have 88% sensitivity and 97% specificity (cutoff > or =6) and 81% sensitivity and 99% specificity (cutoff > or =7) in the validation set. CONCLUSION: A reliable diagnosis of AIH can be made using a very simple diagnostic score. We propose the diagnosis of probable AIH at a cutoff point greater than 6 points and definite AIH 7 points or higher.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The revised AIH score and the simplified AIH score have been used retrospectively to identify PBC patients treated with corticosteroids.
“Both the revised AIH score [165], and the more recently simplified AIH score [166] have been used to identify patients with PBC treated with corticosteroids retrospectively.”
From EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: The diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis. (2017) · cites this paper as [166]
The Patients section describes a retrospective cohort that included eight PBC/AIH overlap patients, and the paper develops the simplified AIH score. It requires a subsequent response to immunosuppressive therapy for its AIH patients, but does not say the score was used to retrospectively identify PBC patients treated with corticosteroids. This citation supports the simplified-score part of the sentence, not that specific use. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 1,901
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [4]4. Milkiewicz P, Hubscher SG, Skiba G, Hathaway M, Elias E. Recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation. Transplantation 1999; 68:253-256.
- Authors
- Hennes, E. M., Zeniya, M., Czaja, A. J., Parés, A., Dalekos, G. N., Krawitt, E. L., Bittencourt, P. L., Porta, G., Boberg, K. M., Hofer, H., Bianchi, F. B., Shibata, M., Schramm, C., Eisenmann de Torres, B., Galle, P. R., McFarlane, I., Dienes, H., & Lohse, A. W.
- Affiliations
- University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
- Jikei University School of Medicine (JP)
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
- University of Thessaly (GR)
- University of Vermont (US)
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Oslo University Hospital (NO)
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- University of Bologna (IT)
- NTT (Japan) (JP)
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- King's College Hospital (GB)
- University Hospital Cologne (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Lohse, Ansgar W.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-176
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973130325
- Cited by
- 1,901
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 93 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 124 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 128 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 112 · 2019: 118 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 107 · 2016: 100 · 2015: 93 · 2014: 96 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 88
- FWCI
- 54.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
- University of Thessaly Institutional Repository (University of Thessaly) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (C03/02)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › IgG4-Related and Inflammatory Diseases
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
- Keywords
- autoimmune hepatitis, diagnostic criteria, simplified scoring system, autoantibodies, IgG, liver histopathology, diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive System, Gastroenterology, Humans, International Cooperation, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Cohort Studies, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Area Under Curve, Hepatitis, Autoimmune
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review