The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deleterious Effects of Beta-Blockers on Survival in Patients With Cirrhosis and Refractory Ascites†,‡
Open accessAbstract
Beta-blockers may have a negative impact on survival in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the administration of beta-blockers on long-term survival in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. We performed a single-center, observational, case-only, prospective study of patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites who did or did not receive beta-blockers for the prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding; 151 patients were included. The mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 18.8 ± 4.1. All patients regularly underwent large-volume paracentesis and intravenous albumin administration. Seventy-seven patients (51%) were treated with propranolol (113 ± 46 mg/day). The median follow-up for the whole group was 8 months. The median survival time was 10 months [95% confidence interval (CI) = 8-12 months]. The probability of survival at 1 year was 41% (95% CI = 33%-49%). The clinical characteristics and laboratory values at enrolment were not significantly different between patients who were receiving propranolol and those who were not. The median survival time was 20.0 months (95% CI = 4.8-35.2 months) in patients not treated with propranolol and 5.0 months (95% CI = 3.5-6.5 months) in those treated with propranolol ( P = 0.0001). The 1-year probability of survival was significantly lower in patients who received propranolol [19% (95% CI = 9%-29%)] versus those who did not [64% (95% CI = 52%-76%), P < 0.0001]. The independent variables of mortality were Child-Pugh class C, hyponatremia and renal failure as causes of refractory ascites, and beta-blocker therapy. Conclusion: The use of beta-blockers is associated with poor survival in patients with refractory ascites. These results suggest that beta-blockers should be contraindicated in these patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Garcia‐Tsao, G., Abraldes, J. G., Berzigotti, A., & Bosch, J. (2017) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.28906 · Cited by 2,154
Guidelines on the management of ascites in cirrhosis
Aithal, G. P., Palaniyappan, N., China, L., Härmälä, S., Macken, L., Ryan, J. M., Wilkes, E. A., Moore, K., Leithead, J. A., Hayes, P. C., et al. (2021) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2020-321790 · Cited by 680
Interactions of the heart and the liver
Møller, S., & Bernardi, M. (2013) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht246 · Cited by 490
Bureau, C., Thabut, D., Oberti, F., Dharancy, S., Carbonell, N., Bouvier, A., Mathurin, P., Otal, P., Cabarrou, P., Péron, J. M., et al. (2017) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.016 · Cited by 452
Verbeke, L., Farre, R., Trebicka, J., Komuta, M., Roskams, T., Klein, S., Elst, I. V., Windmolders, P., Vanuytsel, T., Nevens, F., et al. (2014) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.26939 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Sersté, T., Melot, C., Francoz, C., Durand, F., Rautou, P.-E., Valla, D., Moreau, R., & Lebrec, D.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1017-1022
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2111820868
- Cited by
- 530
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deleterious Effects of Beta-Blockers on Survival in Patients With Cirrhosis and Refractory Ascites†,‡. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.23775
- The paper
- Sersté, T., Melot, C., Francoz, C., Durand, F., Rautou, P.-E., Valla, D., Moreau, R., & Lebrec, D. (2010). Deleterious Effects of Beta-Blockers on Survival in Patients With Cirrhosis and Refractory Ascites†,‡. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23775
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.