Randomized trial comparing monthly ibandronate and weekly alendronate for osteoporosis in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: HEPATOLOGY, Vol. 00, No. X, 2013 GUAÑABENS ET AL.
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: Osteoporosis resulting in bone fractures is a complication in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Once-weekly alendronate improves bone mass and is well tolerated in these patients, but there is a concern because of poor compliance. Therefore, the efficacy, adherence, and safety of monthly ibandronate (150 mg) with weekly alendronate (70 mg) were compared in a randomized, 2-year study in 42 postmenopausal women with PBC and osteoporosis. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and proximal femur (by DXA), liver function, and bone markers were measured at entry and every 6 months over 2 years. Adherence to therapy was assessed by the Morisky-Green score. At enrollment, the two groups were similar with respect to age, BMD, severity of cholestasis, previous fractures, and bone markers. Thirty-three patients, 14 in the ibandronate group and 19 in the alendronate group, completed the trial. At 2 years both treatments resulted in a significant increase in BMD at the lumbar spine (from 0.875 ± 0.025 to 0.913 ± 0.026 g/cm(2), P < 0.001 with alendronate, and from 0.898 ± 0.024 to 0.949 ± 0.027 g/cm(2), P < 0.001 with ibandronate). The mean percentage change was 4.5% and 5.7%, respectively (P = not significant). BMD increased at the total hip by 2.0% and 1.2%, respectively. Changes in bone markers were similar in both groups and one patient with alendronate developed a new vertebral fracture. Adherence to therapy was higher with ibandronate (P = 0.009). Neither treatment impaired liver function or cholestasis. CONCLUSION: Both regimens, weekly alendronate and monthly ibandronate, improve bone mass and are comparable in safety for osteoporosis therapy in patients with PBC, although adherence is higher with the monthly regimen. Further larger studies are needed to assess fracture prevention.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A randomized trial showed that alendronate significantly improves bone density versus placebo in osteoporotic patients.
“In patients identified as having osteoporosis, alendronate was shown in a randomized controlled trial to significantly improve bone density compared with placebo.”
From Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2018 Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [239]
The Results report a significant increase in lumbar-spine bone mineral density from baseline with alendronate. But this randomized trial compared alendronate with ibandronate, not placebo, and studied postmenopausal women with primary biliary cirrhosis and osteoporosis. The claimed placebo comparison is therefore unsupported by this trial. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAlendronic acid is usually used first line if a bisphosphonate is required.
“If a bisphosphonate is required, alendronic acid is usually used first line.254–257”
From The British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC primary biliary cholangitis treatment and management guidelines (2018) · cites this paper as [256]
The Discussion (page not supplied) says osteoporosis treatment in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis mostly relies on oral bisphosphonates, particularly weekly alendronate. This supports its usual use in that population, but does not establish alendronic acid as the usual first-line bisphosphonate generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMonthly ibandronate has similar safety and efficacy to weekly alendronate.
“monthly ibandronate was found comparable to weekly alendronate in safety and efficiency.(239)”
From Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2018 Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [239]
Ibandronate and alendronate have similar efficacy and safety.
“both drugs have a comparable efficacy and safety profile.(239)”
From Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2018 Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [239]
Monthly ibandronate has better adherence than weekly alendronate.
“a monthly regimen with ibandronate is associated with higher adherence compared with a weekly alendronate regimen”
From Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2018 Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [239]
Etidronate does not improve outcomes compared with placebo in osteoporotic patients.
“Etidronate was ineffective compared with placebo”
From Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2018 Practice Guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (2019) · cites this paper as [239]
The introduction mentions trials of etidronate in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, including bisphosphonate comparisons with placebo, but gives no result for etidronate versus placebo. The Results report outcomes for ibandronate and alendronate only. Searches for etidronate’s effectiveness versus placebo found no passage establishing the claimed lack of benefit. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 99
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Kanis JA. Treatment of generalized osteoporosis with inhibitors of bone resorption. In: Kanis KA, ed. Osteoporosis. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science; 1994. p 168-195.
- Authors
- Guañabens, N., Monegal, A., Cerdá, D., Muxí, Á., Gifre, L., Peris, P., & Parés, A.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Guañabens, Núria
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 2013-10-29
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2070-2078
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1802577891
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 7.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Hepatology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
- Keywords
- primary biliary cirrhosis, osteoporosis, ibandronate, alendronate, bisphosphonates, bone mineral density, medication adherence, postmenopausal women, vertebral fractures, bone turnover markers, cholestasis, liver function
- MeSH terms
- Ibandronic Acid, Administration, Oral, Aged, Diphosphonates, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Biliary, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Bone Density, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Treatment Outcome, Alendronate, Fractures, Bone
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review