The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toxicity of azathioprine and monocrotaline in murine sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatocytes: The role of glutathione and relevance to hepatic venoocclusive disease
Abstract
The mechanisms leading to hepatic venoocclusive disease (HVOD) remain largely unknown. Azathioprine and monocrotaline were studied as part of a series of studies looking at a variety of toxins that induce HVOD to find common features that might be of pathogenic significance. In a previous study, dacarbazine showed selective in vitro toxicity to sinusoidal endothelial cells (SEC) compared with hepatocytes and a key role for SEC glutathione (GSH) was demonstrated. Murine SEC and hepatocytes were isolated and studied in culture. Azathioprine and monocrotaline were found to be selectively more toxic to SEC than to hepatocytes. The relative resistance of hepatocytes to azathioprine was due to enhanced GSH defense: hepatocytes exposed to azathioprine maintained intracellular GSH levels better than SEC, particularly when supplemental GSH precursors were added, and hepatocyte resistance was completely overcome by depletion of intracellular GSH. In contrast, monocrotaline toxicity in hepatocytes was largely unaffected by depletion of GSH, which suggests that selectivity of monocrotaline for SEC may be attributable to differences in metabolic activation. Both compounds are detoxified by GSH in SEC, as demonstrated by enhanced toxicity in the presence of buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) and attenuation of toxicity with exogenous GSH. SEC GSH levels were more than 70% to 80% depleted by monocrotaline and azathioprine, respectively, before cell death. Azathioprine and monocrotaline are selectively toxic to SEC; the mechanism of toxicity in the SEC may be caused by profound GSH depletion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vascular disorders of the liver # †
DeLeve, L. D., Valla, D.-C., & Garcia-Tsao, G. (2009) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.22772 · Cited by 978
Self-citationCharacterization of A Reproducible Rat Model of Hepatic Veno–Occlusive Disease
DeLeve, L. D., McCuskey, R. S., Wang, X., Hu, L., McCuskey, M. K., Epstein, R. B., & Kanel, G. C. (1999) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.510290615 · Cited by 324
Self-citationGorbacheva, V. Y., Kondratov, R. V., Zhang, R., Cherukuri, S., Gudkov, A. V., Takahashi, J. S., & Antoch, M. P. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0409897102 · Cited by 270
Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells
Sørensen, K. K., Simon‐Santamaria, J., McCuskey, R. S., & Smedsrød, B. (2015) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c140078 · Cited by 257
Review article: herbal and dietary supplement hepatotoxicity
Bunchorntavakul, C., & Reddy, K. R. (2013) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.12109 · Cited by 249
Metadata
- Authors
- DeLeve, L. D., Wang, X., Kuhlenkamp, J. F., & Kaplowitz, N.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 1996-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 589-599
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001786662
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicity of azathioprine and monocrotaline in murine sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatocytes: The role of glutathione and relevance to hepatic venoocclusive disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.510230326
- The paper
- DeLeve, L. D., Wang, X., Kuhlenkamp, J. F., & Kaplowitz, N. (1996). Toxicity of azathioprine and monocrotaline in murine sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatocytes: The role of glutathione and relevance to hepatic venoocclusive disease. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510230326
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.