The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Algorithm for the Grading of Activity in Chronic Hepatitis C
Open accessAbstract
Histological activity reflects the global assessment of basic necroinflammatory lesions and is a criterion of major importance in chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to propose and test the accuracy of a simple algorithm that generates a single activity score based on basic pathological features. A panel of 10 pathologists reviewed 363 chronic hepatitis C liver biopsies and graded the activity of hepatitis according to their own experience (reference activity). Then, a consensual algorithm on the grading of activity was established by the 10 experts in a panel discussion. Finally, stepwise discriminant analysis was performed to define which basic features had been intuitively used in the reference activity (statistical activity). To test the accuracy of the algorithm, concordance between the activity defined by the algorithm and the reference activity was assessed. It was compared with concordance between the activity defined by the statistical model and the reference activity. The algorithm proposed by the panel for the grading of activity included piecemeal necrosis and lobular necrosis. Concordance between reference activity and activity defined by the algorithm was substantial (305 cases, 84%, κ = .75). Discriminant analysis showed that piecemeal necrosis, lobular necrosis, and portal inflammation were independently used to grade the activity. Concordance between reference activity and activity defined by the statistical model was substantial (300 cases, 83%, κ = .73), virtually identical to the concordance between reference activity and activity defined by algorithm. This study proposes a simple algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis. Its accuracy is as high as that obtained using a statistical approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C
Poynard, T., Bedossa, P., & Opolon, P. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07642-8 · Cited by 3,011
Self-citationManno, C. S., Pierce, G. F., Arruda, V. R., Glader, B., Ragni, M., Rasko, J. J. E., Ozelo, M. C., Hoots, K., Blatt, P., Konkle, B., et al. (2006) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1358 · Cited by 2,163
(2015) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.006 · Cited by 1,875
Leclercq, S., Matamoros, S., Cani, P. D., Neyrinck, A. M., Jamar, F., Stärkel, P., Windey, K., Tremaroli, V., Bäckhed, F., Verbeke, K., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1415174111 · Cited by 972
Bariatric Surgery Reduces Features of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Morbidly Obese Patients
Lassailly, G., Caiazzo, R., Buob, D., Pigeyre, M., Verkindt, H., Labreuche, J., Raverdy, V., Leteurtre, E., Dharancy, S., Louvet, A., et al. (2015) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.014 · Cited by 762
Metadata
- Authors
- Bedossa, P., & Poynard, T.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 1996-08
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 289-293
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2094174828
- Cited by
- 4,088
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Algorithm for the Grading of Activity in Chronic Hepatitis C. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.510240201
- The paper
- Bedossa, P., & Poynard, T. (1996). An Algorithm for the Grading of Activity in Chronic Hepatitis C. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510240201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.