Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 671

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meta–Analysis of Interferon Randomized Trials in the Treatment of Viral Hepatitis C: Effects of Dose and Duration

Open access
Poynard, T, Leroy, V, Cohard, M, Thevenot, T, Mathurin, P, Opolon, P, Zarski, J P·1996·Hepatology

Abstract

The aims of this study were to evaluate the benefits of higher doses or of longer duration in comparison with a standard interferon regimen (3 MU three times per week for 6 months) in chronic hepatitis C, and to assess the efficacy of interferon in acute hepatitis C. Meta–analysis made use of the Peto et al. and the Der Simonian and Laird methods, with heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses. In chronic hepatitis, a total of 17 trials versus controls and of 16 trials comparing different interferon regimens were included. Standard regimen, 3 MU three times per week for 6 months, was associated with an increase of the complete alanine transaminase (ALT) response rate and sustained (ALT) response rate by 45% (95% confidence interval: 35% to 55%; P < .001) and 21% (13% to 28%; P < .001), respectively, with the natural course being less than 2% of spontaneous responses. There was a significant dose effect (6 vs. 3 MU three times per week) upon the sustained response rate at 12 months, with a mean 17% increase (7% to 28%; P < .001), but not at 6 months. There was a significant duration effect (12 vs. 6 months) upon the sustained response rate both at the dose of 3 MU with a mean of 16% (9% to 23%; P < .001), and at the dose of 6 MU three times per week with a mean of 20% (7% to 33%; P = .003). In acute hepatitis C, 3 months of interferon treatment showed significant efficacy versus controls (4 trials), upon the complete ALT response (69% vs. 29%; P < .001), the sustained response rate during the 12 months following treatment (53% vs. 32%; P = .02), and hepatitis C virus (HCV)–RNA clearance (41% vs. 4%; P < .001). The best efficacy/risk ratio was in favor of 3 MU three times per week for at least 12 months in patients with chronic hepatitis C who had never been treated with interferon. Patients with acute hepatitis should be treated with at least 3 MU three times per week for 3 months.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.510240405

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 671

Metadata

Authors
Poynard, T., Leroy, V, Cohard, M., Thevenot, T., Mathurin, P., Opolon, P., & Zarski, J. P.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
1996-10
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
778-789
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069633422
Cited by
671
References
1
FWCI
40.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta–Analysis of Interferon Randomized Trials in the Treatment of Viral Hepatitis C: Effects of Dose and Duration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.510240405
The paper
Poynard, T., Leroy, V, Cohard, M., Thevenot, T., Mathurin, P., Opolon, P., & Zarski, J. P. (1996). Meta–Analysis of Interferon Randomized Trials in the Treatment of Viral Hepatitis C: Effects of Dose and Duration. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510240405

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.