Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 343

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of High– and Low–Risk Patients Before Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study of Nutritional and Metabolic Parameters in 150 Patients

Selberg, O, Bottcher, J, Tusch, G, Pichlmayr, R, Henkel, E, Muller, M J·1997·Hepatology

Abstract

The clinical relevance of malnutrition and hypermetabolism in end–stage liver disease, as well as their effects on survival after liver transplantation (LTx), are largely unknown. This study investigates the prognostic value of nutritional and metabolic parameters obtained before LTx for survival after LTx. One hundred fifty patients with end– stage liver disease undergoing LTx were assessed prospectively and followed for a mean period of 46 ± 16 months after LTx. All patients were randomized into a study group and a validation group, each comprising 75 patients. Body composition analysis (24–hour urinary creatinine excretion, anthropometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis), deviation of measured from predicted resting energy expenditure (ΔREE), year of transplantation, and several variables known to be of prognostic relevance in patients with liver disease undergoing conservative treatment were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier and log rank analysis showed that hypermetabolic patients (ΔREE > +20%) and patients with a body cell mass (BCM) < 35% of body weight tended to have reduced survival after LTx. A risk profile on the basis of ΔREE and BCM identified patients with high risk (5–year survival rate, 54%) and low risk (5–year survival rate, 88%; P < .01). The predictive power of this risk profile was independent of the presence of ascites and clinical edema, and its validity was confirmed in the validation group (P < .01). The Child–Pugh score was not of prognostic value. We conclude that a poor nutritional state, as well as hypermetabolism, adversely affects survival after LTx. These potentially treatable presurgical factors deserve close attention in interventional studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.510250327

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 343

Metadata

Authors
Selberg, O., Bottcher, J., Tusch, G., Pichlmayr, R., Henkel, E., & Muller, M. J.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
1997-03
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
652-657
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046417998
Cited by
343
References
2
FWCI
13.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of High– and Low–Risk Patients Before Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study of Nutritional and Metabolic Parameters in 150 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.510250327
The paper
Selberg, O., Bottcher, J., Tusch, G., Pichlmayr, R., Henkel, E., & Muller, M. J. (1997). Identification of High– and Low–Risk Patients Before Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study of Nutritional and Metabolic Parameters in 150 Patients. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510250327

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.