Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Survival after liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative study

Open access
Figueras, J, Jaurrieta, E, Valls, C, Benasco, C, Rafecas, A, Xiol, X, Fabregat, J, Casanovas, T, Torras, J, Baliellas, C, Ibanez, L, Moreno, P, Casais, L·1997·Hepatology

Abstract

Cumulative recurrence after surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is very high. Several retrospective analyses have shown that liver transplantation was more effective than resection for patients with HCC at early tumor stages. Consequently, in January 1990, we decided to prospectively indicate orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) as the first surgical treatment for small, localized HCC in cirrhotic patients without nodal involvement independently of the degree of liver function. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to analyze prognosis, recurrence rate, and survival after liver transplantation in patients in whom the main indication was HCC with cirrhosis. Thirty-eight patients in whom the main indication for liver transplantation was HCC and hepatic cirrhosis were compared with 136 transplantations because of cirrhosis without tumor, performed in our unit from January 1990 to December 1995. HCC arising in noncirrhotic livers and those incidently discovered after OLT were excluded from the study. Chemoembolization using doxorubicin, lipiodol, and Gelfoam was performed before OLT in 31 patients with good liver function. There were no differences in gender, but HCC patients were older (57 ± 7 vs. 50 ± 10 years [P < .001]). Liver function was better in HCC (Child-Pugh score: 6.9 ± 2 vs. 8.6 ± 1.8; P < .001), and hepatitis C virus antibody was positive in 31 (82%) vs. 51 (37%) (P < .007). Seven tumors had bilobar involvement (18%). Capsule was present in 22 (58%). The mean size of the tumor was 3.4 ± 2 cm. Seventeen tumors (45%) were larger than 3 cm, and 4 (11%) were larger than 5 cm. The average number of nodules was 2 ± 1. The tumor-node-metastasis stage of the tumors was pT1 in 6 patients (16%), 11 were pT2 (29%), 12 were pT3 (31%), and 9 were pT4 (24%). Seven patients were retransplanted in the HCC group (18%) and 19 (14%) in the nontumor group (not significant). Tumor recurrence was detected in three patients (8%). One, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 82% vs. 79%, 75% vs. 71%, and 63% vs. 68%, respectively, for patients with and without HCC, and no differences were found between the two groups (P = .84). Survival was significantly reduced in patients with a macroscopic vascular invasion and tumors greater than 5 cm in diameter. Recurrence and mortality after liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients with carefully selected HCC are similar to the results in cirrhotic patients without tumor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.510250629

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Figueras, J., Jaurrieta, E., Valls, C., Benasco, C., Rafecas, A., Xiol, X., Fabregat, J., Casanovas, T., Torras, J., Baliellas, C., Ibanez, L., Moreno, P., & Casais, L.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
1997-06
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
1485-1489
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2070158817
Cited by
271
References
0
FWCI
6.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival after liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.510250629
The paper
Figueras, J., Jaurrieta, E., Valls, C., Benasco, C., Rafecas, A., Xiol, X., Fabregat, J., Casanovas, T., Torras, J., Baliellas, C., Ibanez, L., Moreno, P., & Casais, L. (1997). Survival after liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients with and without hepatocellular carcinoma: A comparative study. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510250629

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.