Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Expansion of the Tumor Size Limits Does Not Adversely Impact Survival

Open access
Yao, Francis Y., Ferrell, Linda, Bass, Nathan M., Watson, Jessica J., Bacchetti, Peter, Venook, Alan, Ascher, Nancy L., Roberts, John P.·2001·Hepatology

Abstract

The precise staging of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on the size and number of lesions that predict recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has not been clearly established. We therefore analyzed the outcome of 70 consecutive patients with cirrhosis and HCC who underwent OLT over a 12–year period at our institution. Pathologic tumor staging of the explanted liver was based on the American Tumor Study Group modified Tumor–Node–Metastases (TNM) Staging Classification. Tumor recurrence occurred in 11.4% of patients after OLT. The Kaplan–Meier survival rates at 1 and 5 years were 91.3% and 72.4%, respectively, for patients with pT1 or pT2 HCC; and 82.4% and 74.1%, respectively, for pT3 tumors (P = .87). Patients with pT4 tumors, however, had a significantly worse 1–year survival of 33.3% (P = .0001). An α–fetoprotein (AFP) level > 1,000 ng/mL, total tumor diameter > 8 cm, age ≥ 55 years and poorly differentiated histologic grade were also significant predictors for reduced survival in univariate analysis. Only pT4 stage and total tumor diameter remained statistically significant in multivariate analysis. Patients with HCC meeting the following criteria: solitary tumor ≤ 6.5 cm, or ≤ 3 nodules with the largest lesion ≤ 4.5 cm and total tumor diameter ≤ 8 cm, had survival rates of 90% and 75.2%, at 1 and 5 years, respectively, after OLT versus a 50% 1–year survival for patients with tumors exceeding these limits (P = .0005). We conclude that the current criteria for OLT based on tumor size may be modestly expanded while still preserving excellent survival after OLT.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1053/jhep.2001.24563

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 2,262

Metadata

Authors
Yao, F. Y., Ferrell, L., Bass, N. M., Watson, J. J., Bacchetti, P., Venook, A., Ascher, N. L., & Roberts, J. P.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2001-06
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1394-1403
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021299297
Cited by
2,262
References
1
FWCI
25.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Expansion of the Tumor Size Limits Does Not Adversely Impact Survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1053/jhep.2001.24563
The paper
Yao, F. Y., Ferrell, L., Bass, N. M., Watson, J. J., Bacchetti, P., Venook, A., Ascher, N. L., & Roberts, J. P. (2001). Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Expansion of the Tumor Size Limits Does Not Adversely Impact Survival. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2001.24563

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.