The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Liver transplantation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: The tumor-node-metastasis classification does not have prognostic power
Abstract
Tumoral recurrence rate and survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated by orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) depend on tumor stage. Thereby, from the beginning of our program, we selected only patients with solitary tumors ≤5 cm without vascular invasion, thus avoiding the use of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system as a selection tool. The present study reports the results obtained in 58 consecutive patients (52 ± 8 years, 47 males) with HCC (7 incidentals) transplanted between 1989 and 1995. Transplantation was indicated because of tumor diagnosis in 40 cases and advanced liver failure in 18. Mean tumor size at staging was 28.2 ± 12.1 mm. No adjuvant treatment was applied during the waiting period (58.9 ± 45.1 days). The pathological tumor-node-metastasis (pTNM) classification allocated 15 patients to stage I, 19 to stage II, 11 to stage IIIA, and 13 to stage IVA showing preoperative understaging in 43% of the cases with known tumor. After a median follow up of 31 months, only two patients have shown tumor recurrence and fifteen have died, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival being 84%, 74%, and 74%. All HCV+ patients remain infected and 94% showed significant liver disease (6 cirrhosis). Six patients have had a second transplant. In conclusion, the application of restrictive criteria not following the TNM staging system prompts excellent results for liver transplantation in patients with HCC, both in terms of survival and disease recurrence, even without applying adjuvant treatment; however, the survival data should be tempered by the appearance of complications that may worsen the long-term prognosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices
Pugh, R. N. H., Murray-Lyon, I. M., Dawson, J. L., Pietroni, M. C., & Williams, R. (1973) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800600817 · Cited by 7,941
Cited by
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma
Galle, P. R., Forner, A., Llovet, J. M., Mazzaferro, V., Piscaglia, F., Raoul, J.-L., Schirmacher, P., & Vilgrain, V. (2018) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019 · Cited by 11,406
Self-citationEASL–EORTC Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma
European Association for the Study of the Liver, & European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (2012) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.001 · Cited by 5,218
Jonas, S., Bechstein, W. O., Steinmüller, T., Herrmann, M., Radke, C., Berg, T., Settmacher, U., & Neuhaus, P. (2001) · Hepatology · doi:10.1053/jhep.2001.23561 · Cited by 894
Effect of cisapride on intestinal bacterial overgrowth and bacterial translocation in cirrhosis
Pardo, A., Bartolí, R., Lorenzo-Zúñiga, V., Planas, R., Viñado, B., Riba, J., Cabré, E., Santos, J., Luque, T., Ausina, V., et al. (2000) · Hepatology · doi:10.1053/he.2000.5746 · Cited by 177
Metadata
- Authors
- Llovet, J. M., Bruix, J., Fuster, J., Castells, A., Garcia-Valdecasas, J. C., Grande, L., França, A., Brú, C., Navasa, M., Ayuso, M. D., Solé, M., Real, M. I., Vilana, R., Rimola, A., Visa, J., & Rodés, J.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1572-1577
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025732411
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Liver transplantation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: The tumor-node-metastasis classification does not have prognostic power. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.510270616
- The paper
- Llovet, J. M., Bruix, J., Fuster, J., Castells, A., Garcia-Valdecasas, J. C., Grande, L., França, A., Brú, C., Navasa, M., Ayuso, M. D., Solé, M., Real, M. I., Vilana, R., Rimola, A., Visa, J., & Rodés, J. (1998). Liver transplantation for small hepatocellular carcinoma: The tumor-node-metastasis classification does not have prognostic power. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510270616
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.