The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization: An Audit of 84 Patients
Abstract
Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) was performed in 84 patients before extensive liver resection for various diseases. By the criteria of liver volumetric determination, some patients were candidates for PVE, whereas others were not, even though the same surgical procedure, such as extended right lobectomy (ERL), was scheduled. PVE using gelatin sponge powder induced hypertrophy in the nonembolized lobe (0%–171%; median, 30%) and proportional atrophy in the embolized lobe in 2 weeks without eliciting any major inflammatory or necrotic reaction, as evidenced histologically and by the minimal elevations in the serum aspartate transaminase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) values. Alterations in the total bilirubin level and prothrombin time were also insignificant and transient, indicating that hepatocyte functions were not impaired by PVE. Not all patients who undergo PVE proceed with the scheduled hepatic resection procedure, so it is a great advantage that gelatin sponge causes minimal damage compared with other embolizing materials such as cyanoacrylate and absolute ethanol, which have been reported to induce an inflammatory reaction or histological alteration. Our multiple regression analysis showed that three factors, diabetes mellitus, a high total bilirubin level at the time of PVE, and being male, each reduced the extent of hypertrophy in the nonembolized lobe (r 2 = .30). By contrast, cholestasis appeared to accelerate the process of atrophy in the embolized lobe (r 2 = .16). In conclusion, PVE by gelatin sponge powder is a safe and effective preoperative maneuver that induces hypertrophy of the section of the liver that will remain after partial hepatectomy
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
One Thousand Fifty-Six Hepatectomies Without Mortality in 8 Years
Imamura, H. (2003) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1198 · Cited by 835
Self-citationPortal Vein Embolization Before Right Hepatectomy: Prospective Clinical Trial
Farges, O., Belghiti, J., Kianmanesh, R., Marc Regimbeau, J., Santoro, R., Vilgrain, V., Denys, A., & Sauvanet, A. (2003) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000048447.16651.7b · Cited by 676
Portal vein embolization: rationale, technique and future prospects
Abdalla, E. K., Hicks, M. E., & Vauthey, J. N. (2001) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01658.x · Cited by 425
Kokudo, N., Tada, K., Seki, M., Ohta, H., Azekura, K., Ueno, M., Ohta, K., Yamaguchi, T., Matsubara, T., Takahashi, T., et al. (2001) · Hepatology · doi:10.1053/jhep.2001.26513 · Cited by 339
Guiu, B., Chevallier, P., Denys, A., Delhom, E., Pierredon-Foulongne, M.-A., Rouanet, P., Fabre, J.-M., Quenet, F., Herrero, A., Panaro, F., et al. (2016) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-016-4291-9 · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Imamura, H., Shimada, R., Kubota, M., Matsuyama, Y., Nakayama, A., Miyagawa, S.-I., Makuuchi, M., & Kawasaki, S.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 1999-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1099-1105
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965111637
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization: An Audit of 84 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.510290415
- The paper
- Imamura, H., Shimada, R., Kubota, M., Matsuyama, Y., Nakayama, A., Miyagawa, S.-I., Makuuchi, M., & Kawasaki, S. (1999). Preoperative Portal Vein Embolization: An Audit of 84 Patients. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510290415
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.