Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Features and Survivial of Cirrhotic Patients With Subclinical Cognitive Alterations Detected by the Number Connection Test and Computerized Psychometric Tests

Open access
Amodio, Piero, Del Piccolo, Franco, Marchetti, Piergiorgio, Angeli, Paolo, Iemmolo, Rosamaria, Caregaro, Lorenza, Merkel, Carlo, Gerunda, Giorgio, Gatta, Angelo·1999·Hepatology

Abstract

The prevalence and the clinical implications of subclinical cognitive alterations in cirrhotic patients have not been well defined as yet. Therefore, we performed a study to assess the clinical features and the survival of cirrhotic patients with cognitive alterations detected by the number connection test (NCT) and a set of computerized psychometric tests (Scan, Choice1, and Choice2) measuring the reaction times and the percentage of errors in performing specific tasks. Ninety–four cirrhotic patients (aged 58 ± 9 years) without overt hepatic encephalopathy and 80 controls (aged 53 ± 15 years) were consecutively enrolled. The median follow–up in cirrhotic patients was 426 days (lower quartile = 213 days; upper quartile = 718 days). Results of the NCT, Scan test, and Choice2 test were significantly worse in cirrhotic patients, whereas Choice1 did not differ significantly from the controls. In cirrhotic patients, the prevalence of altered psychometric tests was 21% (CI 95% = 14%–31%) by NCT, 23% (CI 95% =15%–33%) by Scan test, and 20% (CI 95% =16%–30%) by Choice2 test. The alterations of NCT, Scan, and Choice2 were found to be related to the severity of liver disease, independently of its etiology. Increased risk of death was found to be associated with altered Scan test (hazard ratio = 2.4; CI 95% =1.1–5.3), or altered Choice2 test (hazard ratio = 2.8; CI 95% = 1.2–6.3). Multivariate regression showed that Scan and Choice2 tests had prognostic value on survival, in addition to Child–Pugh classes in the first year of follow–up.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.510290619

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
Amodio, P., Del Piccolo, F., Marchetti, P., Angeli, P., Iemmolo, R., Caregaro, L., Merkel, C., Gerunda, G., & Gatta, A.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
1999-06
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
1662-1667
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072139861
Cited by
251
References
1
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Features and Survivial of Cirrhotic Patients With Subclinical Cognitive Alterations Detected by the Number Connection Test and Computerized Psychometric Tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.510290619
The paper
Amodio, P., Del Piccolo, F., Marchetti, P., Angeli, P., Iemmolo, R., Caregaro, L., Merkel, C., Gerunda, G., & Gatta, A. (1999). Clinical Features and Survivial of Cirrhotic Patients With Subclinical Cognitive Alterations Detected by the Number Connection Test and Computerized Psychometric Tests. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510290619

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.