The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Features and Survivial of Cirrhotic Patients With Subclinical Cognitive Alterations Detected by the Number Connection Test and Computerized Psychometric Tests
Open accessAbstract
The prevalence and the clinical implications of subclinical cognitive alterations in cirrhotic patients have not been well defined as yet. Therefore, we performed a study to assess the clinical features and the survival of cirrhotic patients with cognitive alterations detected by the number connection test (NCT) and a set of computerized psychometric tests (Scan, Choice1, and Choice2) measuring the reaction times and the percentage of errors in performing specific tasks. Ninety–four cirrhotic patients (aged 58 ± 9 years) without overt hepatic encephalopathy and 80 controls (aged 53 ± 15 years) were consecutively enrolled. The median follow–up in cirrhotic patients was 426 days (lower quartile = 213 days; upper quartile = 718 days). Results of the NCT, Scan test, and Choice2 test were significantly worse in cirrhotic patients, whereas Choice1 did not differ significantly from the controls. In cirrhotic patients, the prevalence of altered psychometric tests was 21% (CI 95% = 14%–31%) by NCT, 23% (CI 95% =15%–33%) by Scan test, and 20% (CI 95% =16%–30%) by Choice2 test. The alterations of NCT, Scan, and Choice2 were found to be related to the severity of liver disease, independently of its etiology. Increased risk of death was found to be associated with altered Scan test (hazard ratio = 2.4; CI 95% =1.1–5.3), or altered Choice2 test (hazard ratio = 2.8; CI 95% = 1.2–6.3). Multivariate regression showed that Scan and Choice2 tests had prognostic value on survival, in addition to Child–Pugh classes in the first year of follow–up.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.
Hyman, R. (1953) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0056940 · Cited by 1,443
Cited by
D'Amico, G., Garcia-Tsao, G., & Pagliaro, L. (2006) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2005.10.013 · Cited by 2,687
Subclinical hepatic encephalopathy predicts the development of overt hepatic encephalopathy
Romero-Gómez, M. (2001) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9270(01)02692-2 · Cited by 411
Nardelli, S., Gioia, S., Ridola, L., Farcomeni, A., Merli, M., & Riggio, O. (2019) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.30304 · Cited by 109
Mood, cognition and EEG changes during interferon α (alpha-IFN) treatment for chronic hepatitis C
Amodio, P., De Toni, E. N., Cavalletto, L., Mapelli, D., Bernardinello, E., Del Piccolo, F., Bergamelli, C., Costanzo, R., Bergamaschi, F., Poma, S. Z., et al. (2005) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2004.09.004 · Cited by 61
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Amodio, P., Del Piccolo, F., Marchetti, P., Angeli, P., Iemmolo, R., Caregaro, L., Merkel, C., Gerunda, G., & Gatta, A.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1662-1667
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072139861
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Features and Survivial of Cirrhotic Patients With Subclinical Cognitive Alterations Detected by the Number Connection Test and Computerized Psychometric Tests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.510290619
- The paper
- Amodio, P., Del Piccolo, F., Marchetti, P., Angeli, P., Iemmolo, R., Caregaro, L., Merkel, C., Gerunda, G., & Gatta, A. (1999). Clinical Features and Survivial of Cirrhotic Patients With Subclinical Cognitive Alterations Detected by the Number Connection Test and Computerized Psychometric Tests. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510290619
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.