Cited by 1,443Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanismsCognitive Abilities and Testing

Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time.

Hyman, Ray·1953·Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

In the typical reaction-time experiment, S's reaction time is greater when he has to respond differentially to one of two equally probable stimuli instead of to just one stimulus. In fact, Merkel (2), using one to ten alternatives, has demonstrated that when S has to respond to one stimulus chosen from a number of equally probable alternatives, his reaction time increases with the number of alternatives. The fact that S's response to stimulus A takes more time when A is one of several rather than one of two equally probable alternatives is of intrinsic interest. But it becomes even more significant when looked at from the standpoint of modern communication theory. In communication theory the amount of information which a message conveys is an increasing function of the number of possible messages from which that particular message could have been selected. The S's reaction time seems to behave,

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0056940

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Hick-Hyman law states that average response time t = c + k log b, where b is the number of equally likely response alternatives.

    “The Hick-Hyman law (Hyman, 1953; Welford, 1980) states that t = c+klogb where b is the number of equally likely response alternatives, c and k are constants, and t the average response time.”
  • Both the Hick-Hyman and Fitts' laws must hold for the menu selection task, and there is no substantial contribution from processes other than log or constant functions of number of alternatives.

    “Thus, both the HickHyman and Fitts' laws must hold, and there must be no substantial contribution from any other processes, e.g. scanning, that is other than a log or constant function of number of alternatives.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hyman, R.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Hyman, Ray
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
1953
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
188-196
ISSN
0022-1015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014448832
Cited by
1,443
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 51
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
reaction time, stimulus information, number of alternatives, differential response, information theory, stimulus probability, reaction time (psychology)
MeSH terms
Humans, Learning, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review